Joe Cortright questions how the Interstate Bridge Replacement Project has spent more than $273 million on ...
-
Opinion: Interstate Bridge: $273 million on consultants for ‘basically the same project?’
Opinion: Interstate Bridge: $273 million on consultants for ‘basically the same project?’
-
Opinion: IBR’s problems are much deeper than its leadership
Opinion: IBR’s problems are much deeper than its leadership
-
Opinion: TriMet & C-TRAN – Who pays versus who gets service
Opinion: TriMet & C-TRAN – Who pays versus who gets service
-
Opinion: ‘The obvious conclusion is to take a simpler, more affordable first step to improving our regional transportation issues’
Opinion: ‘The obvious conclusion is to take a simpler, more affordable first step to improving our regional transportation issues’
-
Opinion: ‘The thing I dislike most about the (I-5 Bridge replacement) project’
Opinion: ‘The thing I dislike most about the (I-5 Bridge replacement) project’
-
POLL: With estimated costs expected to soar beyond $7.5 billion, is it time to consider cost-cutting options for the I-5 Bridge replacement?
POLL: With estimated costs expected to soar beyond $7.5 billion, is it time to consider cost-cutting options for the I-5 Bridge replacement?
-
Updated costs for Interstate Bridge won’t happen until next year
Updated costs for Interstate Bridge won’t happen until next year
-
POLL: Is it more important for area transportation officials to examine a third bridge/crossing over the Columbia River or an I-5 Bridge replacement?
POLL: Is it more important for area transportation officials to examine a third bridge/crossing over the Columbia River or an I-5 Bridge replacement?
-
POLL: Is an Immersed Tube Tunnel a viable option for crossing the Columbia River?
POLL: Is an Immersed Tube Tunnel a viable option for crossing the Columbia River?
-
Is a tunnel actually viable for crossing the Columbia River?
Is a tunnel actually viable for crossing the Columbia River?
