Soaring costs and delays renew debate over I-5 Bridge replacement
The Interstate 5 Bridge replacement is now expected to cost up to $10 billion, with final environmental approvals delayed until 2026 and construction possibly not beginning until 2032 or later. Lawmakers in Washington and Oregon are divided — some remain committed to completing the full project, while others argue it has spiraled into a costly “boondoggle” that should be dramatically scaled back or even ended. This week’s poll asks whether you think lawmakers should consider pulling the plug on the project.
More info:
I-5 Bridge replacement slogs through permitting as costs rise
The I-5 Bridge replacement could cost $10 billion as delays push final environmental review to 2026, leaving lawmakers frustrated over rising costs and uncertain timeline...
Read more
Also read:
- C-TRAN offering free service on Transit Equity Day, Feb. 4
C-TRAN will offer free service across its entire system on February 4 in observance of Transit Equity Day, honoring the legacy of Rosa Parks. - Opinion: The many reminders not to speed
Doug Dahl examines the many technological and policy-based reminders aimed at reducing speeding and explains why most drivers still choose not to use them voluntarily. - Rep. John Ley’s new bill calls for an independent audit of Interstate 5 Bridge Replacement Project
Rep. John Ley introduced legislation requiring an independent audit of the Interstate 5 Bridge Replacement Project to review costs, management, and oversight. - Opinion: IBR’s evasive, misleading and dishonest excuses for higher cost
Joe Cortright argues the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program has withheld detailed cost estimates while offering contradictory explanations for rising costs tied to the I-5 Bridge project. - Rep. David Stuebe sponsors bill to strengthen enforcement of auto insurance laws and protect Washington drivers
Rep. David Stuebe has introduced HB 2308, a bill aimed at strengthening enforcement of Washington’s auto insurance laws and increasing accountability for repeat uninsured drivers.
Dump light rail. It is an extravagant waste that more than doubles if not triples the cost of the project. Four lanes both directions, if not five depending on how SR14, Tomahawk Island, and Hayden Island interchanges fit in (the current ramps and marge points are a joke). The span must include space and height for existing river traffic and future growth. Keep the design simple. Otherwise, to hell with it.
Loot rail has got to go. Trimet just announced a $300 Million hole in their budget, mainly because ridership has dropped so much. They are saying that they may have to cut service on the Green Line as early as 2027, and service cuts to several bus lines as soon as this November. Attempting to partner with any failing transit agency like C-Tran is attempting to do via the IBR is financial suicide.
It is astounding that the spending on this effort is rapidly approaching what the failed CCP spent, with exactly the same results. Time to cut our losses once and for all. Vancouver & Clark County cannot afford our equivalent to Boston’s “Big Dig”.
These people will have spent their entire careers on this project and solved nothing except to collect their PERS pension. We have the wrong group working this boondoggle from CRC to IBR to ???!