Area resident Anna Miller addresses the latest absurdities surrounding the Clark County Council

Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com

A resolution on Immigration and Customs Enforcement, issued by the Clark County Council? Are we being punked? 

One wonders how many more creative ways the Council can invent to spend time, staff resources, and taxpayer dollars on matters that fall entirely outside its authority, while simultaneously stoking public frustration and division. 

Except for adopting the Sheriff’s budget, the County Council has no jurisdiction whatsoever over law enforcement operations. The Sheriff is an independently elected official, solely responsible for daytoday law enforcement decisions. This is not a gray area, nor is it controversial — it is basic county governance. 

For anyone who may have lost the plot, here is the actual business of the people that should occupy the Council’s time: 

• Land use and development policy, including the Comprehensive Plan 

• Allocation of tax revenue and adoption of budgets for county offices 

• Zoning and development codes 

• Countywide land use policy changes (not individual projects or negotiations with developers) 

• Creation and funding of the County Road Fund 

• Adoption of longrange transportation plans 

• Participation in assigned committees, advisory boards, and intergovernmental bodies 

Notably absent from this list: symbolic resolutions about federal law enforcement agencies over which the Council has exactly zero authority. 

It is refreshing, at least, when members of the Council like Councilor Belkot and in this matter Councilor Little, demonstrate a clear understanding of their role and the limits of their power. That level of clarity should not be exceptional — it should be the minimum requirement. 

Perhaps it’s time for the Council, collectively, to stay in its lane and return to the unglamorous but essential work it was elected to do. 

PS: Note to Chair Marshall: If a resolution’s legacy is that it was wiped with and thrown on the floor, as reported, one might reasonably question why it was introduced at all. 

Anna Miller 
Clark County resident and taxpayer

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: Let’s make Washington state affordable for everyone
  Rep. David Stuebe criticizes state lawmakers’ spending increases and calls for tax relief, budget reforms, and restored funding for essential services across Washington.
• 
  Winners, losers and takeaways from WA’s legislative session
  Funding reductions affect Transition to Kindergarten and Running Start, while free school lunches are set for 2029 using new income tax revenue.
• 
  ‘An upward trajectory’: Petroleum expert on Iran conflict’s impact on gas prices
  Drivers in Washington are facing steeper costs at the pump due to supply disruptions, increased taxes, and a closed oil shipping route, which together raise expenses for businesses and consumers.
• 
  Opinion: Legislature agrees to increased spending in Supplemental Budget
  Washington lawmakers approved an $80.2 billion supplemental budget, banking on an income tax that is uncertain to withstand legal and electoral tests despite increasing spending beyond revenue projections.
• 
  Letter:  ‘Only Florida has a more regressive tax structure than Washington’
  Washington households earning the least pay 13.8% in taxes, while the wealthiest 1% pay only 4.1%, according to Camas resident Anthony Teso’s letter.