
Lars Larson addresses the delay in updated cost projections of the I-5 Bridge replacement project
Lars Larson
The Northwest Nonsense
You wanna bet Interstate Bridge Replacement Program (IBR) Administrator Greg Johnson didn’t drop the Interstate Bridge ten-billion-dollar-price-bomb at Portland City Hall this week because the legislature’s plan for a record tax hike got held up?

Only five years ago, Johnson told Oregon and Washington the new I-5 Bridge would cost less than $5 billion. Two years later, his estimate jacked up 50-percent to $7.5 billion.
Standard practice for ODOT … lowball the hell out of a project and tell the buyers – citizens – the bad news when it’s too late to shout “stop.”
Johnson has promised a new cost estimate over and over for the past two years … each time delaying it … like someone who just doesn’t have the guts to deliver bad news.
No one expects the new number to be less than $9 billion … and most, like economist Joe Cortright, predict $10 billion … more than a 100 percent increase in just five years.
I bet if Oregon Democrats had delivered that historic record tax increase they planned last weekend, Johnson would have dropped the news this week.
Instead, he now promises the new estimate later this year or early next year … when he plans to start construction of this already failed project.
They don’t have the money to build it.
The Coast Guard has not given its required approval
Public opposition to funding from freeway tolling remains fierce.
But as long as he hides the bad news, Greg Johnson can keep cashing the checks from his six figure salary.
Also read:
- Opinion: Is a state income tax coming, and the latest on the I-5 Bridge projectRep. John Ley shares a legislative update on a proposed state income tax, the I-5 Bridge project, the Brockmann Campus and House Bill 2605.
- Board authorizes C-TRAN to sign off on Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s SEISThe C-TRAN Board approved the Final SEIS for the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program, with Camas and Washougal opposing the vote over light rail cost concerns.
- C-TRAN ridership grows for fourth consecutive yearC-TRAN ridership topped 5 million trips in 2025, marking the fourth straight year of growth.
- Opinion: ‘If they want light rail, they should be the ones who pay for it’Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance argues that supporters of light rail tied to the I-5 Bridge replacement should bear the local cost of operating and maintaining the system through a narrowly drawn sub-district.
- Opinion: IBR falsely blaming inflationJoe Cortright argues that inflation explains only a small portion of the IBR project’s cost increases and that rising consultant and staff expenses are the primary drivers.







Where is Governor Kotek???