TriMet seeks $190M-$290M for Interstate Bridge light rail vehicles; charging taxpayers up to $15M per vehicle — triple the $4.5M cost

TriMet paid $4.5 million each for four new light rail vehicles to serve its Better Red project. Their 2019 contract was for 26 new vehicles at that price. TriMet officials have been telling the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program the cost for 19 new vehicles they demand will be between $190 million and $290 million, or $10 million to $15 million each. Graphic courtesy John Ley
TriMet paid $4.5 million each for four new light rail vehicles to serve its Better Red project. Their 2019 contract was for 26 new vehicles at that price. TriMet officials have been telling the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program the cost for 19 new vehicles they demand will be between $190 million and $290 million, or $10 million to $15 million each. Graphic courtesy John Ley

Neighbors for a Better Crossing is urging legislators to convene an independent commission to evaluate the ITT alternative before locking taxpayers into a $9 billion-plus financial disaster

VANCOUVER – Washington State Representative John Ley has issued a stark warning to Clark County taxpayers regarding Portland’s TriMet transit agency’s escalating demands for the Interstate Bridge Replacement (IBR) program. According to Ley, TriMet is attempting to overcharge taxpayers for new MAX light rail vehicles, with costs soaring far beyond previous contracts.

In a recent statement on X, and an opinion piece in Clark County Today, Rep. John Ley criticized TriMet’s actions, declaring, “TriMet is trying to fleece taxpayers with inflated costs for light rail vehicles tied to the I-5 Interstate Bridge Replacement project.” A public record request uncovered that four months before the Washington and Oregon governors revived the failed Columbia River Crossing (CRC) project in 2019—a project that collapsed in 2014 when the Oregon Legislature refused funding—TriMet had ordered 26 new Siemens light rail vehicles (LRVs) for $147 million. According to Ley, this averaged under $5 million per vehicle, including parts, manuals, and training. TriMet later paid $4.5 million each for four additional vehicles for its Better Red project under the same 2019 contract.

However, Ley found a significant discrepancy in TriMet’s current demands for the IBR project. “TriMet officials have been telling the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program the cost for 19 new vehicles they demand will be between $190 million and $290 million, or $10 million to $15 million each,” Ley emphasized the need for transparency. “They’re demanding 19 new vehicles at a price that’s more than double what they paid just a few years ago—taxpayers deserve transparency.” 

Four of 30 ordered new light rail vehicles TriMet purchased were for their Better Red extension. The remaining 26 were replacements for the original MAX fleet being retired. They were not needed for the Interstate Bridge project, but for their entire system. Graphic courtesy Wikipedia
Four of 30 ordered new light rail vehicles TriMet purchased were for their Better Red extension. The remaining 26 were replacements for the original MAX fleet being retired. They were not needed for the Interstate Bridge project, but for their entire system. Graphic courtesy Wikipedia

The IBR program itself has seen significant cost escalations. In December 2022, IBR Administrator Greg Johnson updated the project’s cost estimates to a range of $5 billion to $7.5 billion, targeting $6 billion, with the transit component’s high-end cost reaching $2 billion. As part of this, TriMet is demanding Clark County contribute annually to support operations and maintenance for a 1.8-mile MAX Yellow Line extension into Vancouver, alongside the 19 additional light rail vehicles. Ley argues these vehicles are unnecessary for the short extension. 

TriMet’s financial stability and ridership trends further fuel Ley’s concerns. The MAX Yellow Line recorded only 10,611 weekday riders in 2024—70% below the projected 35,320 by 2020. System-wide, TriMet provided 62.3 million boardings in fiscal year 2024, a 29.7% decline since 2014, with MAX light rail ridership dropping 37.7%. The agency reported an $850 million operating loss last year, prompting warnings of a “fiscal cliff” by 2031 without significant bailouts. “Committing Clark County taxpayers to a struggling transit system with questionable financial management is a risky proposition,” Ley cautioned.

TriMet ridership declined precipitously during the pandemic. MAX light rail ridership has remained extremely low and remains below pre pandemic levels. TriMet had indicated system ridership would take six years to recover from the pandemic lockdown decline. Graphic courtesy Wikipedia
TriMet ridership declined precipitously during the pandemic. MAX light rail ridership has remained extremely low and remains below pre pandemic levels. TriMet had indicated system ridership would take six years to recover from the pandemic lockdown decline. Graphic courtesy Wikipedia

Rep. Ley urges the C-TRAN Board and Washington legislators to reconsider long-term financial agreements with TriMet, especially as the Oregon Legislature faces a multi-billion-dollar shortfall for transportation projects. He advocates for prioritizing a third Columbia River bridge, conducting and independent study on an Immersed Tube Tunnel, or replacing the light rail component with cost-effective bus rapid transit to better serve the regions needs.

About John Ley

John Ley is a Washington State Representative serving the 18th Legislative District. A vocal advocate for fiscal responsibility and efficient transportation solutions, Ley focuses on protecting Clark County taxpayers from costly and unsustainable projects.  

About Neighbors for a Better Crossing

A grassroots coalition of concerned residents and businesses from Oregon and Washington, united in advocating for an Immersed Tube Tunnel (ITT) — an innovative solution that will save billions in taxpayer dollars, eliminate the need for tolls, safeguard the Columbia River’s delicate ecosystem and marine life, and preserve the historic I-5 Bridge as a car-free gateway for tourism, pedestrians and cyclists between Oregon and Washington. Neighbors for a Better Crossing is urging legislators to convene an independent commission to evaluate the ITT alternative before locking taxpayers into a $9 billion-plus financial disaster.


Also read:

2 Comments

  1. John T Dunkle

    Light rail is a waste of money. Building additional bridges to have multiple crossings would be a good idea. Stop voting for politicians who keep pushing light rail as Clark County voters have multiple times voted no on the light rail money grab. Stop voting for people who’s only solution to the traffic is to replace an existing bridge.

    Reply
  2. Brad Kille

    Holy crap! What a waste that we do not want and absolutely do not need. Stop with the IBR project now. Clark County residents will not fund TriMet’s recovery, Clark County will never meet those inflated ridership. What will happen, .THIS FAMILY WILL MOVE. Do not dare to TAX Clar County for a boon-dogle. The same people pushing this are the same people as in CA that cannot build 1 foot of track for 12 billion. Same ideology and same politics. REJECT LIGHT RAIL.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *