There was no cost update provided on Monday, much to the chagrin of the legislators
On Monday (Sept. 15), the 16-member joint Washington and Oregon committee overseeing the I-5 Bridge replacement project met for nearly three hours for an update from Interstate Bridge Replacement Program (IBR) Administrator Greg Johnson and his team. This was the first meeting in 10 months and one of only two scheduled for this year.
The IBR was already the most expensive public works project in the region’s history with a top price tag of $7.5 billion, according to the program administrator. However, nearly two years ago, legislators were told the price was going up. There was no cost update provided on Monday, much to the chagrin of the legislators. Comments from citizens put the expected cost in the $8 to $10 billion range.
Johnson is advancing two options: a single-deck bridge with 116 feet of clearance for marine traffic and a movable span option to provide the Coast Guard’s requested clearance of 178 feet.
Rep. John Ley, R-Vancouver, issued the following statement after attending the meeting.
“There were lots of questions and very few complete answers given. A cost update may be provided at the December meeting-the IBR ‘hopes’ to get approval from the Coast Guard, perhaps next April. The Record of Decision from the federal government might be coming in the summer of 2026, which would allow for construction to begin.
“The Federal Transit Administration requires the program to estimate transit ridership with current, more realistic projections. Apparently, the IBR team doesn’t have those projections yet. The Modified Locally Preferred Alternative (mLPA) is projected to be 26,000 to 33,000 daily transit riders on I-5, which none of the legislators in the past believed was accurate.
“There was only a brief mention of the IBR team working with the upriver firms that will be negatively impacted, but no mention of ‘how much’ they are seeking as ‘mitigation.’ In the failed Columbia River Crossing, three firms were going to be given $86 million. Today, there are four firms seeking mitigation.
“With costs of transportation projects in both Washington and Oregon exploding, one would think there would have been a discussion on how to pare back the cost of the project. Sadly, that didn’t happen. I will be working with legislators in both states to have this put on the agenda for our December meeting.
“Citizen comments criticized the shared-use path at the Vancouver waterfront light rail station, saying it was too long and unacceptable. It has been reported to be 2,500 feet long to get down from the expected 90 feet above the ground MAX station. Another citizen called this an ‘enormously reckless project.’
“One slide highlighted federal requirements to be awarded $1 billion for the transit component. It included ‘mobility improvement, cost effectiveness, congestion relief, environmental benefits, and current financial condition” of the transit agency. The current IBR proposal and TriMet fail all of these conditions, and I asked the committee to review them in more depth.
“The $2 billion transit component is presently over one quarter of the total project cost. With transportation dollars in such short supply in both states, we should focus on cost-efficient projects that deliver actual value to taxpayers.
“Legislators also expressed concerns about tolling. Senator Jeff Wilson asked: ‘How much would tolls be if $2.5 billion were borrowed?’ No answer was provided. The level three toll study won’t be completed until next year.
“The current proposal does nothing to improve traffic congestion and freight mobility. It fails to save people time, which is the overwhelming top priority of citizens on both sides of the Columbia River. We can and must do better.”
Rep. Ley represents the 18th Legislative District.
Information provided by the Washington State House Republicans, houserepublicans.wa.gov
Also read:
- Opinion: Too deep to drive – flooded roads
Doug Dahl explains why even shallow water on roadways can be dangerous for drivers and outlines the risks of hydroplaning and driving through floodwaters. - C-TRAN takes no action on Board Composition Review Committee’s directive
After a long executive session, the C‑TRAN board took no action on a 4‑3‑2 board composition proposal that has divided Vancouver, Clark County and the small cities. - Opinion: Sound Transit – No cause for celebration
Charles Prestrud argues Sound Transit’s costly light rail expansions have failed to boost overall ridership or ease Puget Sound congestion. - Opinion: Simultaneous left turns
Doug Dahl explains how Washington law directs drivers to make simultaneous left turns by passing to the left of each other in an intersection. - Judge grants C-TRAN injunction against WSDOT
A judge ruled that WSDOT cannot withhold grants from C-TRAN while the agency’s board composition review process continues.
So when are you or someone going to do something concrete, something substantive, to either change or stop this craziness called the IBR?
I’m with you, John, and agree on all points. However, someone has to step up to the plate and file the injunction lawsuit, or make the formal presentation in Wash., D.C. to the governmental officials, or do whatever it takes to put a stop to this boondoggle.
As it is now, it seems that we all are complaining but no one is doing anything. And that lack of action is all that the crazy female mayor of Vancouver needs to ramrod her agenda through, ignoring the very constituents who put her in office. She MUST be un-elected come November or the citizens of SW Washington will be saddled with ongoing, never-ending debts that will be the financial ruin of cities and those cities’ residents should the current IBR come to fruition.
Good work John and right on Target.
Ae we all know GREG JOHNSON is only there to keep the GRIFT running. He learned well at WSP
And the local dead fish-wrapper is gleefully gaslighting that the IBR will start construction next year. We likely won’t have an updated estimate to this fiasco until next year, but that ain’t stopping anything. I still believe that by the time they come up with any number approaching reality, it will be close to $12 Billion.
I agree with Susan. It is time to start filing injunctions, and inviting Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy to get involved and shut this nonsense down. It would be very helpful if the Coast Guard would weigh back in and confirm that they will not shut down the Columbia River traffic for the IBR and Mayor Annie’s Loot Rail.
Past time to get serious action on this…its almost too late. Once those tolls go up they will never come down.
“Once those tolls go up they will never come down”…. how true, how true!
the columbian released a story today and the numbers they included were so far outdated it had to be intentional. Washington and Oregon officials are considering four tolling scenarios that range from $1.55 to $4.70, and a cost of 6 billion for the project.
David – you are correct – the IBR continues to use old and outdated numbers, knowing most of the press will simply repeat them.
The people on both sides of the river deserve better.
This project is so out of control. Fortunately, a few legislators from both parties, on both sides of the river, are beginning to push back. That pushback is beginning to get some attention in the press. We must keep the pressure on!