The I-5 Bridge replacement proposal fails to address people’s biggest concerns, reducing traffic congestion and saving time
Last Friday, U.S. Congresswoman Marie Gluesenkamp Perez and U.S. Congressman Dan Newhouse invited new U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy to come to the Portland-Vancouver metro area to view the Interstate Bridge Replacement (IBR) project and learn about its importance to the region. Washington state Rep. John Ley, R-Vancouver, who serves the 18th Legislative District, issued the following statement:
“This is nothing more than an overpriced light rail project in search of a bridge. The $2 billion transit component is over one-quarter of the entire cost. The people do not prefer the current ‘locally preferred alternative’ as residents on both sides of the river oppose the project.
The proposal fails to address people’s biggest concerns, reducing traffic congestion and saving time. Portland has the nation’s seventh-worst traffic congestion, and the project administrators admit that morning travel times will double by 2045. The southbound commute from Salmon Creek to the Fremont Bridge will take at least 60 minutes, up from 29 minutes today. That’s unacceptable to the citizens of Southwest Washington.
The U.S. Coast Guard finds the project to be a bridge too low. They want the bridge to have unlimited clearance for marine traffic, which would be offered by either a tunnel or a bascule bridge. However, they will consider one with the current 178 feet of clearance for maritime vessels.
Additionally, the current proposal allocates 54 percent of the bridge surface to transit, bikes, and pedestrians, and only 46 percent to freight haulers and general-purpose traffic. I’m not aware of any interstate freeway in the nation that focuses more on ‘active transportation and transit’ instead of cars and trucks.
Last November, I sent a 20-page letter to outgoing USDOT Secretary Pete Buttigieg outlining the project’s significant problems. A copy of that letter was hand-delivered to Congresswoman Perez’s office in Vancouver. I have not received a response to the people’s significant concerns.
Today, I sent Secretary Duffy my own letter, signed by some of my colleagues from Southwest Washington—Rep. Ed Orcutt of the 20th District and Rep. Jim Walsh of the 19th District—seeking a meeting to highlight the people’s concerns with the project.
I hope the Secretary will give Washington and Oregon elected officials an opportunity to share their concerns about the current proposal. I believe the Department of Government Efficiency, led by Elon Musk, should scrutinize the project.
I welcome the opportunity to meet with Secretary Duffy and share the significant concerns we and many citizens have about the $7.5 billion project.”
The 2025 legislative session began on Jan. 13 and will last 105 consecutive days.
Information provided by the Washington State House Republicans, houserepublicans.wa.gov
Also read:
- Opinion: IBR’s evasive, misleading and dishonest excuses for higher cost
Joe Cortright argues the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program has withheld detailed cost estimates while offering contradictory explanations for rising costs tied to the I-5 Bridge project. - Rep. David Stuebe sponsors bill to strengthen enforcement of auto insurance laws and protect Washington drivers
Rep. David Stuebe has introduced HB 2308, a bill aimed at strengthening enforcement of Washington’s auto insurance laws and increasing accountability for repeat uninsured drivers. - Letter: Interstate Bridge Replacement’s Park & Ride insanity
Bob Ortblad criticizes the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s proposed Park & Ride garages, arguing the costs are excessive and unlikely to receive federal funding. - Letter: Interstate Bridge Replacement $13.6 billion estimate is too low!
Bob Ortblad argues the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $13.6 billion cost estimate understates the true expense, citing comparable projects, construction challenges, and engineering assumptions. - Opinion: ‘The drama and the waste of taxpayer money continues’
Rep. John Ley outlines his objections to the approved fixed-span I-5 Bridge design, citing cost concerns, engineering standards, funding uncertainty, and opposition to light rail and tolls.
wpDiscuz
