A new Clark County Today poll asks readers who should have the primary role when schools face decisions involving a student’s gender identity
A recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling addressing parental rights in education has become part of an ongoing dispute between the La Center School District and the Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction over the district’s gender pronoun policy. In his column, Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance writes that the Court’s opinion reinforces the principle that parents hold primary authority over decisions affecting their children’s upbringing and well-being. With the case still unfolding, Clark County Today is asking readers where they believe that responsibility should lie when issues of gender identity arise at school.
More info:
Opinion: Supreme Court’s ruling should end state’s bullying of the La Center School District
Ken Vance argues a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on parental rights in education could influence the ongoing dispute between the La Center School District and Washingt...
Read more
Also read:
- Letter: Buyer beware (caveat emptor)
Bob Ortblad argues the IBR recycled a $200M bridge design while spending $30M on public relations. - Opinion: John Dickinson and the case against Independence
John Dickinson warned that declaring independence prematurely would be to “brave the Storm in a Skiff made of Paper.” - Opinion: Comparing destruction vs refurbishment of the Interstate Bridges
Rep. John Ley argues $390M earmarked for bridge demolition could fund a seismic retrofit and new express span instead. - Opinion: Only a fool or a politician would try to control food prices
Seattle’s mayor wants city-backed grocery stores — a Washington Policy Center economist says history proves that never works. - Opinion: ‘A more responsible approach must be sought’
Ken Vance argues a $10 billion funding gap makes the phased I-5 Bridge approach fiscally reckless, not responsible.
wpDiscuz
