
Kirk VanGelder, who has spent his career studying and teaching automotive technology, says that by the time a new Interstate Bridge is completed, autonomous vehicles will be the norm, and a better service for taxpayers than less than 2 miles of light rail
Paul Valencia
Clark County Today
The timing of the construction of the Interstate 5 Bridge replacement project and new technologies associated with autonomous vehicles could be perfect, a local expert has told Clark County Today.
So in sync, in fact, that there would be little or no reason to include a small, yet expensive, extension of Oregon’s light rail system into Vancouver.
Imagine, if you will, that the I-5 Bridge replacement project finalized its plans, received approval and funding, and construction started as early as late 2025 or early 2026. Now imagine if Vancouver city leaders get what they want in the project, too — the rest of Clark County to pay up to $2 billion for less than 1.9 miles of light rail track from the Expo Center in North Portland into downtown Vancouver.
Some estimates say it could take up to eight to 10 years to complete the project.
By that time, Kirk VanGelder says, there would be a much better option than less than 10,000 feet of fixed train tracks.
In some larger cities, the future is now. Robo-taxis are already serving the public all over the world, including in America.

VanGelder has spent a career in teaching auto technology. In fact, he has written a book on the subject: Fundamentals of Automotive Technology. He is currently working on a revised third edition of this textbook that is used throughout the English speaking world at colleges and trade schools. A college and high school teacher from Clark County, VanGelder gave his opinion at a recent C-TRAN Board of Directors meeting during public comment.
VanGelder said C-TRAN and city officials could have buyer’s remorse for asking taxpayers to purchase less than 2 miles of light rail.
“Autonomous vehicle (technology) is going to be the preferred solution as soon as it is available,” VanGelder said.
In his expert opinion, it will be available by the time the bridge is built or shortly thereafter.
VanGelder would advise transit agencies across the country to invest in autonomous vehicles. One day, people will be able to order a vehicle to pick them up at Point A and deliver them to Point B. Well, that is happening now through ride share programs and taxis. In the future, those trips will be driverless. Transit agencies such as C-TRAN should be looking at investing in a new form of mass transit, VanGelder says, in order to better serve the taxpaying public, and for better service directly.
Autonomous vehicles could make light rail obsolete, he said.
If C-TRAN and the county do invest in light rail, VanGelder said it would accommodate maybe 10 percent of the population of Clark County.
“We could take money and accommodate 80-plus percent of the county, for probably less money, and give them a better service,” VanGelder said.
Billions of dollars for less than two miles of fixed track? Or a system that can take you and your friends directly where you want to go in an urban environment?
“The next step is going to be autonomous vehicles, which go wherever you want, can pick you up, deliver you, and do so at your convenience,” VanGelder said. “That’s going to be the selling point. It will be between getting on a train full of strangers with other issues or taking your own personal transportation that comes to your door.”
If light rail comes to Vancouver — at the cost of taxpayers throughout Clark County — one will be able to ride the train to Portland International Airport. Of course, for a Ridgefield resident, that would mean driving to Vancouver or taking a bus to a new park and ride, getting on a light rail train to travel south, slowly through North Portland to the Rose Quarter. Then changing trains to travel east toward Gateway, and then north again to the Airport.
Or, in say 2035, perhaps there will be an option to have an autonomous vehicle take you directly from Ridgefield to the airport. Which one would you choose?
C-TRAN already has a rideshare program. Today, The Current will pick you up from your door and deliver you to a doctor’s office or the grocery store, for the same cost as a bus fare. For now, The Current — with human drivers, or course — only delivers customers within districts designated by C-TRAN. But if one wants to travel outside of the district, The Current will take a customer to a bus transit center.
If C-TRAN is already investing in rideshare programs, why would it not potentially expand that program to include autonomous vehicles in the future, and/or expand the coverage area? Autonomous vehicles — vans or small buses — would be less expensive than light rail cars, and they would have the ability to serve a larger area than less than 2 miles of track.
So just how close are we to autonomous vehicles?
It helps, VanGelder said, to get an understanding of how the industry describes levels of autonomy in vehicles.
Older cars, with no cruise control, are at Level 0, for example. All driving conditions are solely controlled by the driver.
- Level 1: all driving conditions are controlled by the driver, but some systems can act independently, such as braking, steering, and standard cruise control. This is where most cars are today.
- Level 2: one system controlling braking, steering, and acceleration can act independently of the driver. There is adaptive cruise control and lane keep.
- Level 3: Critical controls are turned over to the Advanced Driver Assistance Systems under certain driving environments. Drivers can still take control.
- Level 4: Fully autonomous as far as safety control under most, but not all, environments.
- Level 5: A fully autonomous system.
Today, the Mercedes-Benz S Class and EQS Sedan are the most autonomous vehicles available to the general public, according to a report provided by VanGelder. They are designated as Level 3.
But experts say a lot is going to change in the coming years. By the end of this decade, Level 2 and Level 3 systems likely will become standard features in new vehicles for the public. In the early 2030s — and the bridge likely won’t be done until 2034 at the earliest — it is anticipated that there will be large-scale deployments of Level 4 robo-taxis and other autonomous commercial vehicles.
There are test programs going on right now in America. There is a pilot program in West Palm Beach, Fla, with a Level-4 autonomous electric shuttle.
Waymo has delivered one million rides per month in early 2025 in cities in California, Arizona, and Texas, for example. Waymo is on track to provide more than 25 million rides in 2025, up from 4 million rides in 2024.
VanGelder noted the timing in a report he provided to Clark County Today: In the early 2030s, there will be a large-scale deployment of autonomous taxis and other commercial vehicles.
That works, he said, because the purpose of the new bridge is to take people “from here to there, either by private or public entities,” VanGelder said.
Detractors say autonomous vehicles will not help with traffic. VanGelder noted that with less than 2 miles of added track to the current light rail system, cars will still be needed.
Residents from east Vancouver or Camas will still need to find a way to get to the light rail station in downtown Vancouver.
Plus, VanGelder noted, the systems in autonomous cars will find the fastest routes available. Also, for people using autonomous cars as a rideshare, they can schedule pick-ups during non-peak times, when possible. Those cars will arrive at the customer’s convenience.
VanGelder is not against mass transit. He noted that light rail does have its benefits, especially just before and after large sporting events in Portland, for example. You are a proponent of buses over fixed light rail. They are not limited to a single track. But the cost to add just less than 2 miles of track to bring MAX to Vancouver does not seem to make much economic sense to him, when alternative modes of transportation are going to be available about the time any new bridge is completed.
“Once this gets into place,” VanGelder said of the system of autonomous vehicles, “it’s going to make other systems obsolete. People will select the more convenient way.”
Also read:
- Opinion: Too deep to drive – flooded roadsDoug Dahl explains why even shallow water on roadways can be dangerous for drivers and outlines the risks of hydroplaning and driving through floodwaters.
- C-TRAN takes no action on Board Composition Review Committee’s directiveAfter a long executive session, the C‑TRAN board took no action on a 4‑3‑2 board composition proposal that has divided Vancouver, Clark County and the small cities.
- Opinion: Sound Transit – No cause for celebrationCharles Prestrud argues Sound Transit’s costly light rail expansions have failed to boost overall ridership or ease Puget Sound congestion.
- Opinion: Simultaneous left turnsDoug Dahl explains how Washington law directs drivers to make simultaneous left turns by passing to the left of each other in an intersection.
- Judge grants C-TRAN injunction against WSDOTA judge ruled that WSDOT cannot withhold grants from C-TRAN while the agency’s board composition review process continues.







How about NO. Anything that has more involvement from any Public entity is just another GRIFT.
There’s ZERO chance of the I 5 bridge getting built untill people WAKE UP and not vote DUMB.
Extending Portland’s light rail system into Clark County is simply a non-starter. Rail is inflexible, expensive, and inefficient. I grew up in the SF Bay Area and watched the development and construction of the BART system. The “Concord Line” was designed to replace a Greyhound commuter bus operation. At the time the system was being designed, thousands of clerical staff commuted into The City from the suburbs. By the time BART was built and operating, San Francisco devised a payroll tax that caused large corporations to move “back office” staff into the suburbs. BART had been designed to serve the most heavily populated portions of the suburban area — however, land for office parks in the suburbs was not available particularly close to BART tracks/stations. So thousands of jobs ended up in office parks that were not served by BART (or any public transit for some time).
Building inflexible rail systems is a waste of money. In the Clark County/Portland area, the current volume of commuters, who are likely to take public transit, can easily be service by a few busses that might go to one of the primary Tri-Met transfer stations. A new bridge, if it is really necessary (which I doubt) could have “HOV” lanes to improve transit time for busses and commuter automobiles with multiple passengers. Of course, the “real” solution would be to build a bridge to the west of the existing bridge and associated freeway passing west of central Portland so that through traffic would no longer have to share the highway with those going into the central part of the city. Sadly, it is obviously unlikely that common sense will prevails as the politicians and rent-seeking contractors have too much invested in wasting taxpayer funds.