Opinion

The MAX Yellow Line doesn’t deserve a green light

TriMet has continued to push for expansion of the Yellow Line, with plans to extend the line into Washington state across the proposed new I-5 bridge.

By Taylor Marks · June 7, 2022
Part of this storylineI-5 Interstate Bridge Replacement273 stories →
The MAX Yellow Line doesn’t deserve a green light
TriMet has continued to push for expansion of the Yellow Line, with plans to extend the line into Washington state across the proposed new I-5 bridge. Photo courtesy Cascade Policy Institute
TriMet has continued to push for expansion of the Yellow Line, with plans to extend the line into Washington state across the proposed new I-5 bridge. Photo courtesy Cascade Policy Institute
TriMet has continued to push for expansion of the Yellow Line, with plans to extend the line into Washington state across the proposed new I-5 bridge. Photo courtesy Cascade Policy Institute

TriMet has continued to push for expansion of the Yellow Line, with plans to extend the line into Washington state across the proposed new I-5 bridge

Taylor Marks
Cascade Policy Institute

Over-promised and under-delivered.

Throughout its 18-year life, TriMet’s Yellow Line MAX has never met its promised ridership projections.

In fact, just before the pandemic hit, Yellow Line ridership was more than 25 percent lower than where it was projected to be for 2020. Following the COVID-19 drop-off in ridership, TriMet now doesn’t expect transit ridership to hit pre-pandemic levels until sometime after 2045.

Because of low ridership, TriMet is failing to abide by its commitments to service frequency. TriMet promised the Federal Transit Administration that Yellow Line trains would arrive every 10 minutes during peak hours and every 15 minutes off-peak. Instead, Yellow Line trains run every 15 minutes during peak periods and every 30 minutes during other parts of the day.

Despite this consistent underperformance, TriMet has continued to push for expansion of the Yellow Line, with plans to extend the line into Washington state across the proposed new I-5 bridge.

Is slow, low-ridership light rail really the best usage of lane space on the proposed I-5 bridge? Or, should the new bridge instead expand lane capacity for trucks and cars usage to reduce congestion on the region’s freeways?

Taylor Marks is a Research Associate at Cascade Policy Institute, Oregon’s free market public policy research organization.

Related Coverage

Opinion: Two lies and a truth about Oregon Transportation Finance
More on I-5 Interstate Bridge ReplacementOpinion

Opinion: Two lies and a truth about Oregon Transportation Finance

September 22, 2026
POLL: The IBR project is described as only 30% designed and 30% funded after more than six years of work. How confident are you in the current management of the IBR program?
More on I-5 Interstate Bridge ReplacementOpinion

POLL: The IBR project is described as only 30% designed and 30% funded after more than six years of work. How confident are you in the current management of the IBR program?

September 11, 2026
Opinion: Two bridges, one expanding bill
More on I-5 Interstate Bridge ReplacementOpinion

Opinion: Two bridges, one expanding bill

September 10, 2026
Letter:  IBR’s top truck speed 20 mph?
More on I-5 Interstate Bridge ReplacementOpinion

Letter: IBR’s top truck speed 20 mph?

September 8, 2026

Comments

Loading comments…