
Target Zero Manager Doug Dahl answers a question about simultaneous left turns
Doug Dahl
The Wise Drive
Q: My wife and I have a question. Say two cars on a two-lane highway approach an intersection from opposing directions at the same time, both wanting to turn left. Usually both drivers make their turns by passing each other on the left, but we recall from years ago that both drivers are to pull forward until parallel to each other and make their turn after passing by the other vehicle. What’s right?
A: Setting aside the law for a moment, I suppose what’s most important is that whatever they do, they both do the same thing. Realistically though, we can’t set aside the law, and there is a right answer.

So we’re all clear on the scenario, the best way I can describe this is to imagine that someone stuck a big orange pylon in the center of an intersection. In example one from your question, both drivers turn left before they get to the pylon. In example two, they both turn after they pass the pylon (and each other). If this were ballroom dancing for cars, the second maneuver might be more lovely and graceful but, as far as I know, ballroom dancing for cars isn’t a thing. And now that I’ve mentioned it, if it becomes a reality TV show I want partial credit for the idea.
Memory is tricky. You can be 100 percent sure you recall something correctly and still be 100 percent wrong. One memory study showed participants a fake picture of them in a hot air balloon and about half of the participants developed a false memory of the event. Of a more serious nature, three-quarters of wrongful criminal convictions that were overturned with DNA evidence involved witness misidentification.
We all misremember things, so there’s no judgement here when I tell you that you probably don’t remember your driving instruction correctly. The law states that “whenever practicable, the left turn shall be made to the left of the center of the intersection…” Just in case the law was different in previous decades, I looked back 50 years in the Revised Code of Washington. The wording is slightly different, but the rule remains the same.
Confirming the language in the law, the Washington Driver Guide has a diagram of cars making left turns in an intersection. The bold green lines representing the cars’ routes show that they pass to the left of each other, turning before they reach the center of the intersection. If I were to add a pylon to the graphic, both left-turning drivers would turn on the near side of it and pass the pylon with the passenger sides of their cars closest to it.
For any readers thinking to themselves, “Of course that’s how you drive through an intersection,” I’ll encourage you to have enough humility to recognize that while you’re right this time, there are probably some driving rules you’ve misremembered too. How much of what you learned in high school do you think you’ve remembered accurately? Hopefully we remember more about how to drive than we do about trigonometry or English lit since we practice regularly, but I’ve written about 500 of these columns now responding to driving questions, so that’s a good indicator of how much we misremember or forget entirely.
Safe driving depends on all of us following a shared set of rules, but we’re humans, and we sometimes misremember and make mistakes. Along with following the driving rules as best as you remember them, leave a bit of extra space (and a generous amount of understanding) for when other drivers don’t get it quite right.
Also read:
- Opinion: Simultaneous left turnsDoug Dahl explains how Washington law directs drivers to make simultaneous left turns by passing to the left of each other in an intersection.
- Judge grants C-TRAN injunction against WSDOTA judge ruled that WSDOT cannot withhold grants from C-TRAN while the agency’s board composition review process continues.
- Opinion: TriMet’s fiscal cliff continues to be a warning to Clark County and Oregon residentsRep. John Ley’s opinion column details TriMet’s worsening finances, warning Clark County residents about the risks of any financial ties to the transit agency.
- Letter: Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s ridiculous rampBob Ortblad critiques the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s latest shared use path ramp design and questions the purpose and cost of the project.
- Opinion: Why you can’t bribe your way to a low fixed span bridgeJoe Cortright argues that the Coast Guard is unlikely to approve the IBR’s proposed 116-foot fixed span, citing longstanding navigation requirements and past conflicts over river clearance.






