Half of America’s states have banned this horror show
Lars Larson
The Northwest Nonsense
This morning (Wed., June 18), the Supreme Court decided that sensible states can ban the genital mutilation of children in the name of America’s transgender insanity.
Unfortunately, up on Portland’s Pill Hill, the medical Mengeles at Doernboecher are still cutting up kids confused about their gender.
I would welcome those doctors on my talk show anytime to explain how castrating boys and sterilizing girls is a good idea.
Tennessee passed a law banning such mutilation. 24 other states have passed the same laws. Not surprisingly, Justices voted on ideological lines, six to three.
The three liberals who voted in favor of cutting up kids included the newest Justice, Kentanji Brown Jackson, who, during her confirmation hearings confessed that she couldn’t tell Senators what a woman is … because she’s not a biologist.
I look forward to reading her dissent in favor of doctors cutting and pasting the private parts of their pediatric patients.
So let’s add this up. Half of America’s states have banned this horror show. Most of Europe has banned it too. The medical establishment admits there’s no science behind it.
Yet, the horror show continues and in many cases, taxpayers fund it.
Also read:
- Opinion: The income tax proposal has arrived
Ryan Frost of the Washington Policy Center argues that a proposed Washington income tax creates a new revenue stream rather than delivering tax reform or relief. - Opinion: ‘If they want light rail, they should be the ones who pay for it’
Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance argues that supporters of light rail tied to the I-5 Bridge replacement should bear the local cost of operating and maintaining the system through a narrowly drawn sub-district. - POLL: If a sub-district is created, what area should it include?
Clark County residents are asked where a potential C-TRAN sub-district should be drawn if voters are asked to fund light rail operations and maintenance costs. - Opinion: IBR falsely blaming inflation
Joe Cortright argues that inflation explains only a small portion of the IBR project’s cost increases and that rising consultant and staff expenses are the primary drivers. - Letter: The Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $141 million bribe can be better spent on sandwich steel-concrete tubes
Bob Ortblad argues that an immersed tunnel using sandwich steel-concrete tubes would be a more cost-effective alternative to the current Interstate Bridge Replacement Program design.
