
Target Zero Manager Doug Dahl addresses a potentially dangerous traffic maneuver
Doug Dahl
The Wise Drive
Q: I was taught when turning left at an intersection onto a street with two lanes in each direction, to turn into the left (and closest) of the two lanes. If I want to eventually be in the right-hand lane, I signal and move right when it’s safe to do so. Sometimes a car behind me immediately speeds into the right-hand lane, cutting me off from moving there myself after the turn. Is that legal?
A: Maybe this is a bigger problem than traffic. I’m a traffic safety nerd, not a social anthropologist, and unqualified to speculate on this, but I’ll do it anyway. Here’s my premise: life is too convenient. I was going to say easy, but that’s not right. Life can be hard sometimes, but even then, it’s still too convenient. We can summon almost anything we need in seconds with a pocket-sized device that makes the computer NASA used to land a lunar module on the moon look downright primitive. This convenience has manifested itself in our lack of patience. Over a third of us are unwilling to wait five seconds for a webpage to load.

Is it any wonder that we don’t have the patience to properly make a left turn? Why turn to the correct lane and then signal before moving over one lane when we could save the effort of moving our left hand a few inches to engage the turn signal? I have an answer.
About a quarter of all traffic fatalities and over a third of serious injury crashes in Washington occur in and around intersections. Maybe you think that’s not so bad; most serious crashes aren’t happening at intersections. That’s true, but intersections make up a small percentage of the miles we drive, and we travel at comparatively lower speeds through them. Per mile traveled, intersection crashes are way over-represented. The problem is all the opportunities for conflict.
How do you minimize conflict in an inherently risky bit of transportation infrastructure? Be predictable; do what other drivers expect you to do. When making a left turn, stay in your lane all the way through the intersection. Or as it says in the law, “A vehicle shall be driven as nearly as practicable entirely within a single lane and shall not be moved from such lane until the driver has first ascertained that such movement can be made with safety,” and when turning left, the driver should leave the intersection in “the extreme left-hand lane lawfully available to traffic moving in the same direction as the vehicle on the roadway being entered.”
Even if you were to argue that the extreme left-hand lane isn’t available because the car in front of you is in it (a weak argument in my opinion), you still have a problem. Let’s work this out: Say I’m approaching an intersection and I want to turn left. I signal my intent for at least the last 100 feet prior to making a turn. Once I’m in the intersection, if I want to move to over I’d need to signal to the right, again for at least 100 feet. Street lanes are typically about 10 feet wide, so if we do the math it’s unlikely that you’ll find an intersection that takes more than 100 feet to get through. Practically then, it’s not really possible to change lanes during a left turn while complying with the law.
The Washington Driver Guide agrees with me, saying, “stay in your original lane as you turn,” and, “Once you complete your turn, you can change to another lane if you need to.”
Also read:
- C-TRAN ridership grows for fourth consecutive yearC-TRAN ridership topped 5 million trips in 2025, marking the fourth straight year of growth.
- Opinion: ‘If they want light rail, they should be the ones who pay for it’Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance argues that supporters of light rail tied to the I-5 Bridge replacement should bear the local cost of operating and maintaining the system through a narrowly drawn sub-district.
- Opinion: IBR falsely blaming inflationJoe Cortright argues that inflation explains only a small portion of the IBR project’s cost increases and that rising consultant and staff expenses are the primary drivers.
- Letter: The Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $141 million bribe can be better spent on sandwich steel-concrete tubesBob Ortblad argues that an immersed tunnel using sandwich steel-concrete tubes would be a more cost-effective alternative to the current Interstate Bridge Replacement Program design.
- A sub-district vote could be a way to go to pay O&M costs associated with light railClark County Council members heard details on how a voter-approved C-TRAN sub-district could be created to fund long-term operations and maintenance costs for light rail tied to a new Interstate Bridge.






