
Council split highlights ongoing debate over whether C-TRAN board representatives must follow group direction or act independently
A divided Clark County Council has once again delayed a decision on its representation on the C-TRAN Board, as disagreement continues over how those representatives should vote. The debate intensified when Councilor Michelle Belkot said she would not follow potential council mandates, while others argued board members should reflect the will of the full council. The issue remains unresolved, raising broader questions about governance, accountability, and how elected officials represent their constituents.
More info:
More drama at Clark County Council in regard to its representatives on the C-TRAN Board
Councilors debated whether C-TRAN board representatives must follow group mandates, with Michelle Belkot refusing to commit to new voting rules and Glen Yung opposing her...
Read more
Also read:
- Opinion: Were Republican voters just sleeping during the August primary election?CCRP Chairman Matt Bumala says 60% of primary no-shows in the 17th and 18th districts were Republicans.
- Opinion: WA Cares’ launch showcased care WA Cares did not provideGov. Ferguson showcased a caregiving arrangement at the WA Cares launch that the program had not paid for a single day of.
- Auditor, auditor candidate address scrutiny over job titleGreg Kimsey says roughly 40 county employees hold the deputy county auditor designation Kelly used in his campaign.
- Opinion: Is Mitchell Kelly misleading voters with his ‘deputy auditor’ claim?Clark County HR records show no position called “Deputy County Auditor” has ever existed, Anderson argues.
- Opinion: Democrats rig the ballot to save their income taxChurchill argues the ballot disclosure warning voters of education cuts describes revenue never collected and not yet allocated.







