
Council split highlights ongoing debate over whether C-TRAN board representatives must follow group direction or act independently
A divided Clark County Council has once again delayed a decision on its representation on the C-TRAN Board, as disagreement continues over how those representatives should vote. The debate intensified when Councilor Michelle Belkot said she would not follow potential council mandates, while others argued board members should reflect the will of the full council. The issue remains unresolved, raising broader questions about governance, accountability, and how elected officials represent their constituents.
More info:
More drama at Clark County Council in regard to its representatives on the C-TRAN Board
Councilors debated whether C-TRAN board representatives must follow group mandates, with Michelle Belkot refusing to commit to new voting rules and Glen Yung opposing her...
Read more
Also read:
- Letter: When the city of Vancouver’s own photos prove the problemOver 5,000 Vancouver police photos obtained via FOIA show repeated cleanup notices and the same conditions returning.
- Opinion: What would it take for elected officials to believe high earners are leaving Washington?Capital gains tax collections fell more than 50% in 2024 despite a 25% stock market gain that year.
- Opinion: IBR creates 50,000 road refugeesLars Larson argues IBR’s tolling plan would push 50,000 daily commuters off I-5 onto I-205.
- Arrest made in 2025 Fern Prairie fatal collisionMatthew Kenne’s blood alcohol was above 0.08 when his Jeep struck a tree, killing 18-year-old Nicholas Ortiz.
- Opinion: It’s time to save taxpayers from Sound Transit’s strategic misrepresentationSound Transit’s ST3 rail program faces a $35 billion shortfall, and Southwest Washington taxpayers could bear new costs.







