
Doug Dahl says we all have a responsibility to do whatever we can to avoid a crash, even when the other driver makes a mistake
Doug Dahl
The Wise Drive
Q: Here’s the scenario: There are two cars going in opposite directions on the same roadway. One driver makes a left onto a road with two lanes of travel in either direction at the same time as the other driver is making a right onto that same road. Who has the right-of-way?
A: I’m going to assume that this intersection is controlled by a traffic signal. Yeah, I know what ‘assume’ makes out of ‘u’ and ‘me’. But if we have a road with two lanes in each direction, it’s a safe bet. Plus, we need to know what kind of traffic control each driver is facing as they approach the intersection, so let’s say it’s lights.

In a perfect world we wouldn’t need to answer this. The law has a section called “Required position and method of turning at intersections,” which the Washington Driver Guide nicely summarizes: “Whether turning left or right at an intersection, state law requires you to turn into the lane closest to the direction you are coming from.” With two lanes in each direction, both the left-turning and the right-turning driver would have a lane available to them without conflicting with the other.
But the fact that this question was asked is one more bit of evidence (as if we needed it) that we don’t live in a perfect world. If we’re looking at who to blame in a crash, we could point to the law I just mentioned and say the driver who didn’t stay in their nearest lane was at fault. That would be a good start.
It might not be that simple though. There are some other laws about turning we should consider. Let’s say both drivers have a green light. The traffic signal law states that turning drivers “shall stop to allow other vehicles lawfully within the intersection control area to complete their movements.” I suppose you could argue that if the other turning driver doesn’t stay in their lane, they’re not there legally. Still, the law makes it clear that even with a green light, drivers must yield to other cars already in the intersection.
There’s also a law specifically for left-turning drivers that says they “shall yield the right-of-way to any vehicle approaching from the opposite direction which is within the intersection or so close thereto as to constitute an immediate hazard.” The law recognizes that left turns are uniquely hazardous and puts extra responsibility on drivers turning left.
That responsibility shifts some when the driver turning right has a red light. At an intersection that permits right turns on a red light, a driver “shall remain stopped to allow other vehicles lawfully within or approaching the intersection control area to complete their movements.” Right-on-red is a higher risk maneuver, and drivers who do it have a responsibility to do it safely.
I’ll also point out that you don’t have to take a right turn on a red light. If you don’t want to take on the increased risk, you can wait for the green. If you’re concerned about delaying the drivers behind you, keep in mind that you’re not obligated to accept someone else’s higher risk tolerance for their convenience.
If I had to rank the priority of all the laws I just listed, I’d put the one about staying in the correct lane while turning at the top. If we could all follow that, we wouldn’t need to go to the rest of them. But we all have a responsibility to do whatever we can to avoid a crash, even when the other driver makes a mistake.
Also read:
- Opinion: Greg Johnson’s $2 million contract delivered a huge messJohnson’s $1.9M pay coincided with IBR costs tripling and construction timeline doubling to 20 years.
- Cracking down on rough roads along I-5 in VancouverCrews are rebuilding 2.2 miles of southbound I-5 using a crack, seat and overlay method through summer 2026.
- Opinion: IBR Environmental Review confirms impacts to Hayden Island while leaving key safeguards undefined59 residential displacements and up to 15 years of construction face Hayden Island under the IBR’s Final SEIS.
- Vancouver prepares for 2026 pavement seasonVancouver’s $14 million pavement program will pave or preserve over 100 lane miles of street this summer.
- Letter: Interstate Bridge Replacement lies and nonsenseOrtblad’s comment asked whether IBR studied routing 28,000 daily trucks to rail and I-205 by 2040.






