Last year, TriMet lost $850 million with a budget of $1.84 billion
Rep. John Ley
for Clark County Today
TriMet is in financial trouble – demanding huge subsidies from taxpayers via the Oregon Legislature. The agency is currently seeking a five-fold increase in a head tax paid by all Oregon employers. Reports indicate the legislature is considering an 80 percent increase; far short of the 500 percent increase TriMet says they must have.
The Cascade Policy Institute’s John Charles says they’re in a “death spiral” and questions the need for TriMet. Conservative talk show host Lars Larson has labeled TriMet’s demand for 19 over-priced light rail vehicles for the Interstate Bridge project a “fleecing” of taxpayers.
Local news reported “TriMet’s subsidy per ride has soared from $1.77 in 2014 to $7.88 last year. Operating costs are up 53 percent since 2019.” They carry 30 million (30 percent) fewer passengers than they did pre pandemic.
A news commentary labeled it a “doom loop” for TriMet. They mention that even if TriMet got an 80 percent increase from the legislature, the transit agency would still cut 34 of their 78 bus routes by 2027 and two thirds by 2031.
“Put simply, not as many people are taking TriMet to work, whether because they’re no longer required to work in person or because their workplace is no longer in the city center,” said TriMet spokesperson Mark Miller.

Last year, TriMet lost $850 million with a budget of $1.84 billion. Its ridership was down 40 percent and passenger revenues were down 50 percent due to the “slow return to in-person office work.” Yet they added two new divisions including an Inclusion, Diversity, Equity & Accessibility (IDEA).
The agency has had operating losses over $6 billion in the past decade. TriMet received $669.4 million in one-time funds over three years as pandemic relief.
TriMet’s current budget states: “It is expected the fund balances of today will sustain the agency in the future until pre-pandemic levels of revenues return.” The proposed TriMet budget has a 9.5 percent increase in spending. Yet, TriMet officials are telling Oregon legislators they will have to cut 65 percent of their bus routes within the next six years if the agency doesn’t get a significant taxpayer bailout.

Should Clark County Pay?
Part of that bailout could come from Clark County taxpayers, via a $7.2 million annual contribution towards the proposed 1.8-mile MAX light rail extension into Vancouver, as part of the Interstate Bridge Replacement (IBR) program. This would allegedly help pay for operations and maintenance (O&M) of the MAX that will extend 4,350 feet into Vancouver.
Another part of the bailout is TriMet’s demand for 19 new light rail vehicles as part of the Interstate Bridge replacement project. TriMet officials indicate the cost of those vehicles will be between $190 million and $290 million, or $10-$15 million each. Additionally, they demand an upgrade to their Gresham Ruby Junction Facility for $45-$65 million, plus a Light Rail Overnight Facility at Expo for $9-14 million.
The IBR proposes $2 billion for the transit component, for which the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) could contribute up to 50 percent, or $1 billion. This leaves $500 million for each state to find to fund the transit component. Yet just $33 – $50 million of that goes to C-TRAN for express bus service. The overwhelming majority of the money is for TriMet.
C-TRAN has offered the only transit service over the Columbia River for over four decades. Yet TriMet and Portland have never contributed a penny towards C-TRAN O&M costs, nor purchased any buses for the C-TRAN service.
What does a LRT vehicle cost?
In July 2019, TriMet ordered 30 S700 light rail transit (LRT) vehicles from Siemens. The contract included options to purchase an additional 60 vehicles. “We’re bringing on 26 of them to replace our aging first-generation trains, which are gradually being retired,” TriMet reported. Four were for the “Better Red” extension to Hillsboro.
A year later, Sacramento’s transit system ordered eight LRT vehicles from Siemens for $23.6 million, or $3 million each. Orange County (CA) is currently building a new 4.15 mile streetcar line, using eight vehicles, for $649 million.
A Sound Transit report indicates $4.2 million per vehicle in Seattle. Sound Transit just completed a 3.4-mile light rail extension between Redmond and Bellevue for $1.2 billion. The new station at Marymoor Village features a 1,400-car parking garage. There is an elevated station in Downtown Redmond.
The IBR has apparently not questioned TriMet’s demand for 19 LRT vehicles, let alone the price tag of $190 – $290 million for them. Will the FTA dig into the details and question the cost they are being asked to fund?
The reality is that TriMet must replace 26 of its original LRT vehicles purchased in the mid 1980s. They are beyond their useful life. Note the current order was placed four months before the two governors resurrected the previously failed Columbia River Crossing in November 2019.
What does Operations and Maintenance cost?
In 2018, it was reported that the proposed 12-mile Southwest Corridor light rail line would require $22 million in O&M costs, or $1.83 million per mile. Portland area voters rejected that proposal in November 2020.
In FY 2022, TriMet spent $128.1 million on operations for its entire 60-mile MAX light rail system. That equals about $2.1 million per mile. Yet, TriMet officials are demanding over $10 million per mile for IBR O&M costs.”It’s $6.8 million to run light rail transit today and $442,000 to run the bus,” the staff told the board. MAX is 17 times more expensive than buses to operate.
At the December 2024 C-TRAN Board meeting, TriMet officials said their light rail O&M costs would be $20,238,570 for the 1.83-mile MAX extension into Vancouver. That equals $11.06 million per mile. That’s over five times the 2022 costs.

TriMet’s FY 2026 budget shows $539.4 million in O&M costs for their entire system, plus spending another $221 million in capital improvements. The total TriMet budget is $1.94 billion – a 9.5 percent increase from 2025.
Bottom line is that there remain more questions than answers. However, Clark County citizens are wary of paying taxes for a transit agency not owned or operated in Washington state. In April, the C-TRAN Board “got an earful” as dozens of citizens spoke out against supporting light rail with their taxes.
The Board “paused” making a decision to reverse their November policy change, allowing them to “talk” with TriMet about funding the light rail component of the Interstate Bridge Replacement project. Citizens might wonder what the Board has learned, after six months of “talking” with TriMet.
Why should Clark County or Washington taxpayers pay to replace worn out LRT vehicles, let alone fund operations and maintenance of an out of state transit agency? Will TriMet even be around next decade if they actually cut 65 percent of their bus service?
Also read:
- Opinion: Too deep to drive – flooded roadsDoug Dahl explains why even shallow water on roadways can be dangerous for drivers and outlines the risks of hydroplaning and driving through floodwaters.
- C-TRAN takes no action on Board Composition Review Committee’s directiveAfter a long executive session, the C‑TRAN board took no action on a 4‑3‑2 board composition proposal that has divided Vancouver, Clark County and the small cities.
- Opinion: Sound Transit – No cause for celebrationCharles Prestrud argues Sound Transit’s costly light rail expansions have failed to boost overall ridership or ease Puget Sound congestion.
- Opinion: Simultaneous left turnsDoug Dahl explains how Washington law directs drivers to make simultaneous left turns by passing to the left of each other in an intersection.
- Judge grants C-TRAN injunction against WSDOTA judge ruled that WSDOT cannot withhold grants from C-TRAN while the agency’s board composition review process continues.







Please, oh please… will someone in Wash., D.C. please put a stop to all this “IBR” madness ?
Tri-met makes the postal service look like a fiscally responsible operation.
And as the automobile drivers who use the bridge wait in even worse traffic jams because of the exorbitant tolls that are being collected, they will watch those 95% empty light rail cars speed on by. This bridge project is nothing more than a scam to get the taxpaying suckers who drive automobiles to subsidize light rail.
Has everyone forgotten that the bridge carries interstate commerce? The FAA and Coast Guard have not signed off on any of this. Until they do, money is being spent and the bridge is going nowhere.
How much less Federal money (our taxes) are we actually going to get after Trump & Musk apply their axe to us?? These grants can be eliminated or cut drastically.
Trump doesn’t like Oregon,Washington & especially Portland. ODOT gets about 24% of their budget from Uncle Sam. We need and deserve a FULL audit of ODOT, & Tri Met. It is time to get realistic about money. USCG can not legally let IBR clearance issue (about 62 feet) just slide. How much of our taxes were wasted on last Bridge plan, (CRC). I have read a lot more than $200 million.
tri-met is ripping all of off
they allway have for years