VANCOUVER – Families in the Orchards neighborhood in Vancouver now have a safer path for walking, biking or using mobility devices to travel to school, courtesy of funding from the Safe Routes to Schools Project.
On Thursday (Feb. 15), the Washington State Department of Transportation will activate the HAWK signal as the final phase of the recently constructed shared-use path, located on the south side of State Route 500, also known as Northeast Fourth Plain Boulevard, between Northeast 162nd and Northeast 166th Avenues.
What is a HAWK signal?
The HAWK (High intensity Activated crossWalk) signal is a traffic control device used to facilitate safer pedestrian crossings without disrupting traffic flow. Unlike a traditional traffic signal, a HAWK signal is activated and operates only when a pedestrian pushes the crossing button. When there are no pedestrians, vehicles move without interruption.
An activated HAWK signal will operate in a yellow-red-flashing red sequence. When drivers encounter the yellow and red flashing lights, they should treat them just like any other traffic signal. During the flashing red interval, drivers may proceed through the crossing area only if it is completely safe to do so without posing any risk to pedestrians.
Pedestrians can activate the HAWK signal by pushing the button at either end of the crossing. The lights on the HAWK signal will indicate when it is safe to cross. A visual traffic signal aids both drivers and pedestrians in determining when it’s safe to proceed along their chosen route.
In late summer 2023, contractor crews completed the permanent roadway striping along this route, offering additional visual and reflective lane guidance for drivers and enhancing safety for all road users.
Know before you go.
Get real-time travel information via the WSDOT mobile app, the real-time travel map, or by signing up for email updates and alerts.
Also read:
- Opinion: IBR promotes ‘giving away’ historic interstate bridges while withholding cost estimate for replacement
Neighbors for a Better Crossing argues the IBR program is promoting demolition of the historic Interstate Bridges without releasing updated cost estimates or current seismic data to justify replacement. - Opinion: Bikes in crosswalks
Doug Dahl explains how Washington law treats bicycles as both vehicles and pedestrians, depending on where and how they are being ridden. - Opinion: The unpreferred and unaffordable Interstate Bridge replacement proposal
Rep. John Ley argues that the Interstate Bridge Replacement proposal is unpreferred, unaffordable, and failing to address congestion, cost transparency, and community concerns. - Opinion: IBR still holding and lying about coming billions in cost overruns
Joe Cortright argues that Interstate Bridge Replacement officials are deliberately delaying the release of an updated cost estimate that he says could push the project toward $10 billion. - Letter: A call for competent Interstate Bridge project management
Rick Vermeers argues that unchecked scope, rising costs, and missed timelines threaten the survival of the Interstate Bridge Replacement project unless light rail is removed.
