The I-5 Bridge replacement proposal fails to address people’s biggest concerns, reducing traffic congestion and saving time
Last Friday, U.S. Congresswoman Marie Gluesenkamp Perez and U.S. Congressman Dan Newhouse invited new U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy to come to the Portland-Vancouver metro area to view the Interstate Bridge Replacement (IBR) project and learn about its importance to the region. Washington state Rep. John Ley, R-Vancouver, who serves the 18th Legislative District, issued the following statement:
“This is nothing more than an overpriced light rail project in search of a bridge. The $2 billion transit component is over one-quarter of the entire cost. The people do not prefer the current ‘locally preferred alternative’ as residents on both sides of the river oppose the project.
The proposal fails to address people’s biggest concerns, reducing traffic congestion and saving time. Portland has the nation’s seventh-worst traffic congestion, and the project administrators admit that morning travel times will double by 2045. The southbound commute from Salmon Creek to the Fremont Bridge will take at least 60 minutes, up from 29 minutes today. That’s unacceptable to the citizens of Southwest Washington.
The U.S. Coast Guard finds the project to be a bridge too low. They want the bridge to have unlimited clearance for marine traffic, which would be offered by either a tunnel or a bascule bridge. However, they will consider one with the current 178 feet of clearance for maritime vessels.
Additionally, the current proposal allocates 54 percent of the bridge surface to transit, bikes, and pedestrians, and only 46 percent to freight haulers and general-purpose traffic. I’m not aware of any interstate freeway in the nation that focuses more on ‘active transportation and transit’ instead of cars and trucks.
Last November, I sent a 20-page letter to outgoing USDOT Secretary Pete Buttigieg outlining the project’s significant problems. A copy of that letter was hand-delivered to Congresswoman Perez’s office in Vancouver. I have not received a response to the people’s significant concerns.
Today, I sent Secretary Duffy my own letter, signed by some of my colleagues from Southwest Washington—Rep. Ed Orcutt of the 20th District and Rep. Jim Walsh of the 19th District—seeking a meeting to highlight the people’s concerns with the project.
I hope the Secretary will give Washington and Oregon elected officials an opportunity to share their concerns about the current proposal. I believe the Department of Government Efficiency, led by Elon Musk, should scrutinize the project.
I welcome the opportunity to meet with Secretary Duffy and share the significant concerns we and many citizens have about the $7.5 billion project.”
The 2025 legislative session began on Jan. 13 and will last 105 consecutive days.
Information provided by the Washington State House Republicans, houserepublicans.wa.gov
Also read:
- Opinion: Portland’s War on Cars Part 4 – A smarter automobile strategy to end gridlock
O’Toole argues fuel wasted in Portland-area congestion has sextupled since 1982, generating 250,000 tons of extra greenhouse gases annually. - Opinion: Transit ridership trends are dismal but regional plans are oblivious
Puget Sound transit passenger-miles fell 31% from 2015 to 2024 despite a half-million-resident population increase. - Interstate Bridge Replacement Program seeks qualified firms for bridge replacement contract
The CRBR project is backed by $5.7 billion from state funds, federal grants, and future tolling. - Opinion: Bankrupt – A $3.5 billion Rose Quarter Freeway widening project
Joe Cortright argues ODOT’s Rose Quarter project has grown from a $450M approval to a $3.5B estimate, with a $2B funding gap. - Opinion: Portland’s War on Cars 3 – Ending the war on automobiles
O’Toole argues Portland should add toll lanes, fix safety hazards, and redesign TriMet routes to end its anti-auto policies.
wpDiscuz
