
The February voters’ guide includes local ballot measures with supporting and opposing statements written by citizens
VANCOUVER ‒ Every election, the Clark County Auditor’s Office provides an online and printed voters’ guide with information about candidates and ballot measures for voters to make an informed decision when voting. The February voters’ guide includes local ballot measures with supporting and opposing statements written by citizens.
A legislative body placing a measure on the ballot can appoint a committee to write a supporting statement and another committee to write an opposing statement. But often, the Elections Office receives only a supporting statement for a local ballot measure. If the group cannot identify anyone to oppose the ballot measure, then the Elections Office staff attempts to identify citizens interested in authoring such a statement.
For the February 2024 special election, the Elections Office, as the filing officer, has identified three propositions that do not have citizens appointed to write a statement against. There are two ballot propositions from Camas School District. One proposition is for a Replacement Educational Programs and Operations Levy and the other is for a Replacement Capital Levy for Educational Technology, Health and Safety Improvements. The third ballot proposition is from Green Mountain School District for a Replacement Educational Programs and Operations Levy.
To review the complete text of the resolutions, ballot language and other resolutions for the February special election ballot, visit clarkvotes.org and follow the link to Feb. 13, 2024, Special Election Information located near the top of the page.
Any registered voter interested in writing an opposing statement is asked to contact Cathie Garber of the Clark County Elections Department at (564) 397-2345. Call soon as the deadline is 4 p.m. Tuesday, Dec. 19.
“The public is best served by providing information which presents a fair and balanced debate on the merits of local measures submitted for a vote,” said Auditor Greg Kimsey. “We urge anyone interested to help us get their opposing statements to these local measures into the online voters’ guide.”
Information provided by Clark County Elections Department.
Also read:
- POLL: Who should have the primary say in decisions about a student’s gender identity at school?Clark County Today is asking readers who should have the primary role in decisions about a student’s gender identity at school.
- Opinion: Study shows 2025’s record tax increases reduce Washington’s GDP growth and worker payTodd Myers writes that a new economic analysis projects Washington’s 2025 tax increases will slow GDP growth and reduce wages over the next several years.
- City of Washougal advances overcrossing design for 32nd St Rail Crossing ProjectWashougal officials have selected an overcrossing design for the 32nd Street Rail Crossing Project, aiming to improve safety and reduce traffic delays caused by frequent train blockages.
- Letter: Facts aren’t politicalBrian Kendall writes that disagreements about the LEOFF 1 pension debate should begin with accurate facts rather than misinformation.
- Opinion: Trails, roadways and crosswalksDoug Dahl explains how Washington law treats hiking trails that cross roadways and whether pedestrians automatically have the right-of-way.
- Business Profile: Joyful Honey and Beekeeping Supplies making a difference for pollinatorsJoy Bochsler’s Battle Ground shop offers honey, equipment, and classes while helping educate the community about protecting pollinators.
- Opinion: Supreme Court’s ruling should end state’s bullying of the La Center School DistrictKen Vance argues a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on parental rights in education could influence the ongoing dispute between the La Center School District and Washington state officials over gender pronoun policies.








