Brian Kendall addresses responses to his recent letter to the editor
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
In the responses to my recent letter about LEOFF 1, some readers assumed I was defending the Legislature’s decision to transfer surplus funds. I was not. All I did was challenge the misinformation in Nancy Churchill’s column so readers could start with accurate facts.
People can disagree about whether the transfer was a good idea. That is a policy debate. But we cannot have a useful discussion if the starting point is false claims about the plan being “ended,” pensions being “taken,” or billions being “skimmed.” None of those statements were true and correcting them is not a political act, it is a civic one.
Several responses repeated the idea that the state “took money that wasn’t theirs.” The LEOFF 1 surplus exists because of state contributions and state managed investments. That surplus has never been part of any individual retiree’s earned benefit. The plan remains funded at roughly 110%, and every promised benefit to every retiree and surviving spouse is secure.
The emotional reactions to my letter do not change those facts. What they do show is how easily misinformation can take hold when it goes unchallenged. My intention was simply to set the record straight so people can form their own opinions based on accurate information, not fear based rhetoric.
We can disagree about policy. But we should at least agree that the conversation ought to begin with the truth.
Brian Kendall
Republic
Also read:
- Letter: Buyer beware (caveat emptor)
Bob Ortblad argues the IBR recycled a $200M bridge design while spending $30M on public relations. - Opinion: John Dickinson and the case against Independence
John Dickinson warned that declaring independence prematurely would be to “brave the Storm in a Skiff made of Paper.” - Opinion: Comparing destruction vs refurbishment of the Interstate Bridges
Rep. John Ley argues $390M earmarked for bridge demolition could fund a seismic retrofit and new express span instead. - Opinion: Only a fool or a politician would try to control food prices
Seattle’s mayor wants city-backed grocery stores — a Washington Policy Center economist says history proves that never works. - Opinion: ‘A more responsible approach must be sought’
Ken Vance argues a $10 billion funding gap makes the phased I-5 Bridge approach fiscally reckless, not responsible.
