
Congresswoman sends letter to IBR, WSDOT and ODOT officials calling for the cost-effective use of resources to limit tolling and increased vehicular capacity to reduce congestion
On Thursday (Sept. 12), Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (WA-03) sent a letter to the Interstate Bridge Replacement (IBR) Program, WSDOT, and ODOT calling for the prioritization of Southwest Washington bridge users’ concerns in the final project design – both through the cost-effective use of resources to limit tolling and increased vehicular capacity to reduce congestion.
The effort comes after Rep. Gluesenkamp Perez helped secure $2.099 in federal funding for the project, including a $1.499 billion Bridge Investment Program (BIP) grant in July and a $600 million Mega grant in December. The Congresswoman has spoken with Southwest Washington commuters, business owners, and tradespeople about the necessity of this project – and by being good stewards of federal dollars, burdens can be reduced for local drivers.
The I-5 Bridge is a crucial linchpin in both the regional and national economy and plays a vital role in transporting freight along the I-5 corridor. $132 million worth of freight crossed the I-5 Bridge daily in 2020 and 131,747 vehicles crossed each weekday in 2021.
Despite the bridge’s importance, the I-5 Bridge is rated the worst truck bottleneck in Washington and Oregon and the fifth-worst on the West Coast. With seven to 10 hours of traffic daily and a crash rate more than three times higher than Washington averages, it is critical that the final project design effectively and economically addresses congestion for local drivers, commuters, and truckers.
“Both my constituents and bridge users from across the Pacific Northwest list traffic congestion relief as their top transportation priority. The final I-5 Bridge design must prioritize increasing vehicular capacity and easing existing bottleneck conditions to move goods to stimulate our economy, and get folks home faster so they can coach their kid’s Little League team,” wrote Rep. Gluesenkamp Perez in the letter. “We also must ensure that the bridge design is cost-effective and that the final design makes the best use of the significant existing resources secured from federal and state funding. This is a project of national and regional importance, and it is critical that the burden of paying for this project does not fall on local users. I urge you to explore every option to hold down construction costs, reduce congestion, and limit the need for tolling which will disproportionately impact the people I serve.”
Full text of Rep. Gluesenkamp Perez’s letter can be found here.
Also read:
- POLL: After hearing state leaders describe the I-5 Bridge as vulnerable in an earthquake, what is your reaction?State and local leaders describe the I-5 Bridge as structurally at risk but recommend drivers continue crossing it while complex replacement plans unfold.
- WA and OR scale back I-5 Bridge ambitions as cost balloonsA $14.4 billion price tag prompts Washington and Oregon leaders to delay portions of the I-5 bridge project and prioritize just the main spans.
- Letter: ‘Now we have Engineer Bob telling us the I-5 Bridge needs replacing because it is built on shifting sand with wooden structures’Amboy resident Thomas Schenk critiques Democrat leadership, tax policies, and the addition of light rail to the I-5 Bridge, while urging Republican voters to participate more in midterm elections.
- The I-5 Bridge is vulnerable to collapse, but apparently not that vulnerableState leaders and Vancouver’s mayor warn about bridge safety, but insist it’s safe enough for daily use as they focus on moving forward with a costly replacement including light rail—despite decades of public resistance.
- Opinion: ‘This is not the best and most efficient use of the taxpayers’ funds’Ken Vance critiques the announced $14.4 billion I-5 Bridge replacement, questioning funding gaps, the insistence on light rail, unaddressed congestion, and transparency from state officials.






