Home
News

COVID shot 100 times likelier to cause severe harm than prevent it

Date:
in: News, COVID-19
Amid continued university and college COVID-19 vaccine mandates, a study by well-known American and British scientists has found the experimental shots are nearly 100 times more likely to cause a student serious injury than prevent hospitalization with COVID-19.

New study explains why university vaccine mandates are unethical

Art Moore
WND News Services

Amid continued university and college COVID-19 vaccine mandates, a study by well-known American and British scientists has found the experimental shots are nearly 100 times more likely to cause a student serious injury than prevent hospitalization with COVID-19.

The study, which is currently undergoing peer-review, analyzes U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, or VAERS, the British blog Daily Sceptic reported.

The researchers – who include Drs Marty Makary and Stefan Baral of Johns Hopkins University, and Dr. Vinay Prasad of the University of California – estimate that for every COVID-19 hospitalization prevented in previously uninfected young adults, 18 to 98 serious adverse events will occur.

That includes 1.7 to 3 booster-associated myocarditis cases in males and 1,373 to 3,234 cases of serious injury that interferes with daily activities.

Further, the actual risk-benefit profile is even less favorable, the study found, due to the high level of natural immunity following infection in the population.

In summary, the university booster mandates are unethical because:

  • no formal risk-benefit assessment exists for the age group;
  • vaccine mandates may result in a net expected harm to individual young people;
  • mandates are not proportionate: expected harms are not outweighed by public health benefits given the modest and transient effectiveness of vaccines against transmission;
  • U.S. mandates violate the reciprocity principle because rare serious vaccine-related harms will not be reliably compensated due to gaps in current vaccine injury schemes;
  • and mandates create wider social harms.

The Daily Sceptic observed that while the study “is focused on vaccine coercion, its arguments also apply more generally to the offer of vaccination to young adults, and raise questions as to whether vaccine recipients are being fully appraised of the risks and likely benefits before consenting to the inoculation.”

Also read:

Tags:

10 Comments

  1. Sylvia

    Thanks for sharing this great article Art.

    The public is waking up, realizing that the PLANdemic was nothing more than a premeditated attempt at total population control (and reduction??) through fear and chaos.
    The tide is finally turning, and these ethical scientists are leading the way. There are many more, and together they will be a formidable group that will expose the lies and show us the truth.
    Public opinion has also turned, as can be seen from the ever dwindling uptake of the jabs.
    Let’s keep our awareness and critical thinking ability at peak levels.
    They will keep mandating the jabs, so we have to remain vigilant, educate ourselves, and protect our wellness.

    Reply
    1. Wolfie

      No matter how many times you say it, show it, prove it.. just look at the mass deniers. They absolutely refuse to look at any source that might just show them they are wrong. It is really sad.

      Reply
  4. Melissa

    Finally a thorough covid vaccine risk-benefit analysis for young people! Why didn’t the CDC, Pfizer, or Moderna do this in 2020? And what will Governor Inslee and the Washington universities do with this information as it relates to mandating vaccines or boosters? Vaccine mandates for college students should be ended immediately.

    Study abstract:
    Students at North American universities risk disenrollment due to third dose COVID-19 vaccine mandates. We present a risk-benefit assessment of boosters in this age group and provide five ethical arguments against mandates. We estimate that 22,000 – 30,000 previously uninfected adults aged 18-29 must be boosted with an mRNA vaccine to prevent one COVID-19 hospitalisation. Using CDC and sponsor-reported adverse event data, we find that booster mandates may cause a net expected harm: per COVID-19 hospitalisation prevented in previously uninfected young adults, we anticipate 18 to 98 serious adverse events, including 1.7 to 3.0 booster-associated myocarditis cases in males, and 1,373 to 3,234 cases of grade ≥3 reactogenicity which interferes with daily activities. Given the high prevalence of post-infection immunity, this risk-benefit profile is even less favourable. University booster mandates are unethical because: 1) no formal risk-benefit assessment exists for this age group; 2) vaccine mandates may result in a net expected harm to individual young people; 3) mandates are not proportionate: expected harms are not outweighed by public health benefits given the modest and transient effectiveness of vaccines against transmission; 4) US mandates violate the reciprocity principle because rare serious vaccine-related harms will not be reliably compensated due to gaps in current vaccine injury schemes; and 5) mandates create wider social harms. We consider counter-arguments such as a desire for socialisation and safety and show that such arguments lack scientific and/or ethical support. Finally, we discuss the relevance of our analysis for current 2-dose CCOVIDovid-19 vaccine mandates in North America.

    Reply
    1. Wolfie

      The governor will do nothing. He isn’t big on admitting he is wrong and besides, his pockets are being mighty filled by big pharma. Heck, he won’t give up his emergency powers until Halloween. That right there says something

      Reply
  6. Sylvia

    If you are aware of the WEF plans for the “Great Reset” and/or have watched Event 101, you may be interested in the analysis by Kim Iversen.

    According to Iversen, the WEF is “marching us toward” a life of passive obedience to a centralized system of authorities who control and own everything.
    Their message, she said, is “‘just be a good citizen and you have nothing to worry about so long as you don’t speak out against the government, so as long as you follow all the rules … Yes, you won’t have any privacy … You won’t own anything but you will be very, very happy. You just need to do as you’re told.’”
    Iversen added:
    “Thank goodness more and more people are reporting on this and waking up to this saying, ‘No. We are not going to go along with this agenda.”

    Here’s the link:

    https://default.salsalabs.org/T5585beea-2da3-4a69-a67c-dd94a602c715/1f3f68f1-1e32-4c05-aaa5-2940af3c4f91

    Preposterous? Sure is.
    Unbelievable, unimaginable in USA? Becoming less and less so.
    Could this really be what the not so distant future holds for Americans?
    Would a life of ‘passive obedience’ appeal to you?

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Wolfie Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *