
Sen. Lynda Wilson says the real concern is the many billions of dollars’ worth of new spending requests anticipated in the governor’s upcoming budget proposal
A relatively small slump in the state government’s newest revenue projection won’t affect funding for existing state services and programs, says Sen. Lynda Wilson, budget leader for Senate Republicans, adding the real concern is the many billions of dollars’ worth of new spending requests anticipated in the governor’s upcoming budget proposal.
Wilson, R-Vancouver, today attended her final meeting of the Economic and Revenue Forecast Council, which is responsible for adopting quarterly revenue forecasts prepared by the state’s chief economist. She is stepping down from the Senate at the end of this year after 10 years as a state lawmaker.
Compared to the year’s third-quarter forecast that was approved in September, the projected revenue for the 2023-25 fiscal biennium is now down $88 million. The projected decrease for the 2025-27 biennium – which will influence the operating budget lawmakers must adopt in 2025 – is $181 million compared to the previous quarterly forecast.
Wilson, who also served as council chair for the past two years, offered this assessment following the council vote to adopt the final forecast of 2024:
“The chief economist warned our council that the state’s economic growth would be slow this year, and that has been the case. But still, between projected revenue and available reserves there is more than enough to balance a 2025-27 operating budget that maintains the services and programs being provided now.
“The problem – and the reason our Democratic colleagues are already talking about tax increases – is the billions of dollars’ worth of new spending requests we are likely to see in the governor’s budget proposal. Those include $4 billion tied to new collective bargaining agreements with state workers.
“The speaker of the House recently suggested that because the voters didn’t repeal the capital-gains tax, they may be open to new taxes. I wouldn’t go there. The current two-year budget is over $71 billion, which is 82% more than the $39 billion it was after I was elected in 2014. In that same period the population has gone up nearly a million, which is less than 15%. The growth of government spending is far outpacing population growth.
“It’s one thing when revenues fall and can’t sustain the current level of services. That isn’t the case: The headline for today is that funding to continue current service levels is safe for another two years. If there’s a shortfall on the horizon, it will be the result of Democratic overspending. The taxpayers are already sending too much of their money to Olympia.”
Also read:
- OII completes investigation into Clark County Sheriff’s Office use of deadly force in July of 2025A 77-page OII report on the July 30, 2025 death of Branden Whitcomb now goes to the Clark County Prosecutor’s Office.
- VIDEO: Entrepreneur exodus continues as Washington’s new income tax loomsVenice.ai founder Jesse Proudman says Washington’s new income tax is the final blow driving him and others out of the state.
- WA gets $538M in delayed COVID-era payments from FEMAFEMA is sending $538M to Washington state health departments and hospital systems for COVID-era costs after years of delays.
- Opinion: When you’ve lost Christine Gregoire, you’ve lost WashingtonFormer Gov. Gregoire says Washington’s $80B budget reflects a spending problem, not an income problem.
- Letter: Present bridge plan has been in the expensive and unworkable planning stage far too long with no real end in sightBrush Prairie resident Bob Mattila argues the I-5 Bridge plan doubles costs by including light rail on the span.
- Letter: Stop turning gas prices into war propagandaCamas resident Tony Teso fires back at Jonathan Hines, arguing militarism won’t lower fuel costs for working families.
- Letter: Compassion requires accountabilityA medical provider and downtown Vancouver resident challenges whether current homelessness policies produce measurable results.








