🎧 C-TRAN, Light Rail & the Taxpayer Protection Vote
C-TRAN board members rejected a proposal to shield taxpayers from added costs tied to extending light rail to Library Square.
The C-TRAN Board of Directors voted this week to formally ask the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program to extend light rail beyond the planned waterfront station to Library Square, but rejected a proposed amendment that would have shielded taxpayers from any added construction or operating costs tied to the extension. Supporters argued the Library Square location would better connect with C-TRAN’s bus system, while critics questioned where the additional funding could come from and whether taxpayers could ultimately be left covering part of the cost. Clark County Today wants to know what readers think.
More info:
C-TRAN board asks IBR to bring light rail to Library Square, with no protection for taxpayers
C-TRAN's board rejected 7-2 an amendment shielding taxpayers from extra costs tied to a light rail extension that could approach $1 billion.
Read more
Also read:
- Letter: The logistics crisis of universal mail-in voting
Jonathan Hines argues that roughly 70% of voters already bypass mail in favor of drop boxes and in-person delivery. - POLL: Would you support upgrading and reusing the existing Interstate Bridges if it saved billions of dollars?
Rep. John Ley questions whether $400M in bridge demolition costs could be redirected to other regional transportation needs. - Letter: TriMet’s history of over-predicting light rail ridership
TriMet’s MAX Green Line carried ~10,000–11,000 weekday riders in 2024–2026, less than a third of its 2020 forecast. - Letter: ‘The clearest losers are Antifa’
Tyler Long argues Councilor Troy McCoy’s own 2024 rule change backfired spectacularly at the June 1 Battle Ground City Council meeting. - Opinion: SCOTUS should strike down tardy ballots
Lars Larson argues Washington state’s 3-week post-election ballot window undermines public trust in results.
wpDiscuz
