
The decision comes on the heels of the Camas City Council’s unanimous passage of a similar resolution in February, which was authored by Councilor Leslie Lewallen
BATTLE GROUND – Monday (March 3) night, the Battle Ground City Council voted 4-3 to pass a resolution opposing the inclusion of light rail in the Interstate Bridge Replacement (IBR) project, marking another major stand by Southwest Washington communities against the costly and ineffective transit proposal.

This decision comes on the heels of the Camas City Council’s unanimous passage of a similar resolution in February, which was authored by Councilor Leslie Lewallen. The growing opposition underscores the region’s concerns about the light rail portion of the project’s financial burden, lack of congestion relief, and the potential for Portland’s public safety issues to spill into Southwest Washington.
“I’m thrilled to see Battle Ground join the fight against wasteful spending on light rail,” said Lewallen. “This should be a wake-up call for every municipality in Southwest Washington. Our communities deserve real transportation solutions — not billions wasted on a failing system. I encourage other local governments to take a stand and ensure our voices are heard.”
The I-5 Bridge replacement project has already spent $400 million in taxpayer dollars, with light rail being one of its most controversial components. The current proposal includes just 1.9 miles of light rail extending into Washington at a staggering cost of $2 billion, plus nearly $20 million in projected annual operations and maintenance costs.
With two cities now formally opposing light rail, the movement to remove it from the IBR project is gaining momentum. Local leaders and residents across the region are calling for practical, fiscally responsible transit solutions that better serve Southwest Washington’s commuters.
Also read:
- POLL: With updated estimates reaching as high as $17.7 billion, what should happen to the I-5 Bridge replacement project?A new poll asks readers how the I-5 Bridge replacement project should proceed amid higher cost estimates and questions about transparency within the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program.
- Opinion: ‘The IBR team has been lying to us and thanks to a veteran Oregon journalist, we have the smoking gun’Ken Vance argues newly obtained documents show Interstate Bridge Replacement staff withheld updated cost estimates from lawmakers and the public.
- Oregon Gov. Kotek calls for repeal of transportation funding package she championedOregon Gov. Tina Kotek is urging lawmakers to repeal a transportation funding package she previously supported after a referendum effort halted key tax increases.
- Letter: Has $450 million been wasted on a bridge that’s too low for the Coast Guard with a foundation too costly to build?A Seattle engineer questions whether hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent on a bridge design he argues is unnecessarily risky and costly compared to an immersed tunnel alternative.
- Opinion: Transit agencies need accountability not increased state subsidyCharles Prestrud argues that Washington transit agencies face rising costs and declining ridership due to governance structures that lack public accountability.






