WSDOT rejected the review committee’s 3-3-3 board plan, citing proportional representation by population; ...
-
WSDOT denies C-TRAN Board Composition Review Committee’s 3-3-3 plan
WSDOT denies C-TRAN Board Composition Review Committee’s 3-3-3 plan
-
Opinion: TriMet & C-TRAN – Who pays versus who gets service
Opinion: TriMet & C-TRAN – Who pays versus who gets service
-
POLL: Should Clark County’s smaller cities pull out of the C-TRAN Board of Directors and refuse to help fund light rail maintenance & operations?
POLL: Should Clark County’s smaller cities pull out of the C-TRAN Board of Directors and refuse to help fund light rail maintenance & operations?
-
C-TRAN remains committed to all jurisdictions regardless of the makeup of the C-TRAN board
C-TRAN remains committed to all jurisdictions regardless of the makeup of the C-TRAN board
-
Camas considers opting out of C-TRAN
Camas considers opting out of C-TRAN
-
Opinion: State representative continues year-round service to constituents
Opinion: State representative continues year-round service to constituents
-
Opinion: Is Vancouver stacking the vote at C-TRAN?
Opinion: Is Vancouver stacking the vote at C-TRAN?
-
Opinion: ‘The thing I dislike most about the (I-5 Bridge replacement) project’
Opinion: ‘The thing I dislike most about the (I-5 Bridge replacement) project’
-
Opinion: President Trump is the hope for sanity being applied to the I-5 Bridge replacement project
Opinion: President Trump is the hope for sanity being applied to the I-5 Bridge replacement project
-
C-TRAN board member regrets vote that could leave Clark County taxpayers on the hook for light rail
C-TRAN board member regrets vote that could leave Clark County taxpayers on the hook for light rail
