
This week’s poll dives into a major debate surrounding the C-TRAN Board of Directors. Clark County Council recently removed Michelle Belkot from the board after she refused to align with the council’s stance on light rail funding. Now, a proposed bylaw change could require board members to vote collectively with the council, potentially limiting independent decision-making. Supporters argue that a unified vote ensures consistency and accountability, while critics say it strips board members of the ability to represent their constituents. What do you think? Should C-TRAN board members be required to vote as a bloc, or should they maintain their independence? Cast your vote and let us know your thoughts!
More info:
Michelle Belkot speaks out after Clark County Council kicks her off C-TRAN board
Clark County Council removed Michelle Belkot from the C-TRAN Board of Directors after she opposed funding light rail operations and maintenance.
Read more
Also read:
- Letter: C-TRAN makes a mess of Hazel DellVancouver resident Bob Zak criticizes C-TRAN’s Vine bus system for low ridership and ongoing construction disruptions.
- Opinion: Delaying light rail offers best hope for new bridgeTwo Republican senators argue light rail should wait until Clark County voters approve funding for operations.
- Opinion: Eight reasons the Interstate Bridge project shouldn’t – and can’t legally – move forwardCity Observatory analyst identifies eight legal violations in the $15.5 billion Interstate Bridge project.
- Letter: ‘Now is the time to speak up, freedom is worth celebrating’Felida resident urges Clark County to preserve fireworks traditions for America’s 250th Independence Day celebration.
- Opinion: Wolves thriving, cattle producers failingWDFW celebrates 270 wolves in 49 packs while Washington agriculture posts negative $396 million farm income.







