
Public traditions like the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation have long been a part of local government meetings, but should they remain? This week, Clark County Today wants to hear your thoughts!
At a recent Clark County Council meeting, a discussion emerged about whether these traditions should be kept as they are, updated to reflect a more diverse community, or removed to maintain government neutrality. The debate raises important questions about tradition, inclusivity, and the role of public ceremonies in official meetings.
Now, it’s your turn to weigh in! Do you think the Pledge and invocation should stay, change, or go? Cast your vote in our Clark County Today Weekly Poll and let us know where you stand.
More info:
No action taken after county councilor suggests invocation and Pledge of Allegiance are unnecessary
Clark County Council decided to keep the invocation and Pledge of Allegiance after public comments overwhelmingly opposed removing them.
Read more
Also read:
- Letter: C-TRAN makes a mess of Hazel DellVancouver resident Bob Zak criticizes C-TRAN’s Vine bus system for low ridership and ongoing construction disruptions.
- Opinion: Delaying light rail offers best hope for new bridgeTwo Republican senators argue light rail should wait until Clark County voters approve funding for operations.
- Opinion: Eight reasons the Interstate Bridge project shouldn’t – and can’t legally – move forwardCity Observatory analyst identifies eight legal violations in the $15.5 billion Interstate Bridge project.
- Letter: ‘Now is the time to speak up, freedom is worth celebrating’Felida resident urges Clark County to preserve fireworks traditions for America’s 250th Independence Day celebration.
- Opinion: Wolves thriving, cattle producers failingWDFW celebrates 270 wolves in 49 packs while Washington agriculture posts negative $396 million farm income.







