Public traditions like the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation have long been a part of local government meetings, but should they remain? This week, Clark County Today wants to hear your thoughts!
At a recent Clark County Council meeting, a discussion emerged about whether these traditions should be kept as they are, updated to reflect a more diverse community, or removed to maintain government neutrality. The debate raises important questions about tradition, inclusivity, and the role of public ceremonies in official meetings.
Now, it’s your turn to weigh in! Do you think the Pledge and invocation should stay, change, or go? Cast your vote in our Clark County Today Weekly Poll and let us know where you stand.
More info:
No action taken after county councilor suggests invocation and Pledge of Allegiance are unnecessary
Clark County Council decided to keep the invocation and Pledge of Allegiance after public comments overwhelmingly opposed removing them.
Read more
Also read:
- Opinion: Workers needed tax relief, but Olympia gave them something else
Washington’s new 9.9% income tax faces a court challenge and a likely voter initiative before first payments are due in 2029. - Letter: This diagram is a snapshot of failure
Peter Bracchi maps how police, fire, health, and sanitation all converge on one unresolved Vancouver shelter zone. - Opinion: Income Tax Battle Round Two – Signatures needed
Let’s Go Washington needs 300,000+ signatures in under two months to put IP26-645 on the fall ballot. - Letter: Climate Commitment Act critique rests on fossil-funded denial
Anthony Teso argues CCA repeal would transfer savings to Chevron and BP, not working families. - Letter: Why Petition IP26-645 is a stand for the people, not a political party
IP26-645 needs 400,000 signatures by July 2 to repeal Washington’s new income-based tax.
