Public traditions like the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation have long been a part of local government meetings, but should they remain? This week, Clark County Today wants to hear your thoughts!
At a recent Clark County Council meeting, a discussion emerged about whether these traditions should be kept as they are, updated to reflect a more diverse community, or removed to maintain government neutrality. The debate raises important questions about tradition, inclusivity, and the role of public ceremonies in official meetings.
Now, it’s your turn to weigh in! Do you think the Pledge and invocation should stay, change, or go? Cast your vote in our Clark County Today Weekly Poll and let us know where you stand.
More info:
No action taken after county councilor suggests invocation and Pledge of Allegiance are unnecessary
Clark County Council decided to keep the invocation and Pledge of Allegiance after public comments overwhelmingly opposed removing them.
Read more
Also read:
- Letter: Congress quietly advances U.S.-Israel military integration through NDAA – Section 224
Justin Forsman calls for public debate on NDAA Section 224 and U.S.-Israel military technology integration. - Opinion: Governor Ferguson warns of upcoming shortfall after years of overspending
Washington’s $80.2B budget grew more than twice as fast as population and inflation combined since 2013. - Opinion: High stakes, hidden election
Five Washington Supreme Court seats are on the 2026 ballot — shaping income tax law, pension raids, and sheriff authority. - Opinion: Transportation officials may be pivoting as costs explode on interstate bridge replacement
Rail’s share of the I-5 bridge budget may be far larger than the 14% figure officials are citing. - Opinion: The men who wrote the Declaration of Independence
Five men were tasked with drafting the Declaration of Independence — and one nearly wasn’t chosen at all.
