
This week’s poll focuses on exploring the best ways to handle high-risk DUI offenders. As detailed in our recent story, the Target Zero DUI Treatment Court is one of the intensive therapy programs designed to address the root causes of dangerous driving behaviors. However, there are other methods to consider, such as increased jail time and fines or mandatory ignition interlock devices to prevent repeat offenses. Some believe that a combination of therapy and traditional penalties might be the most effective solution. We want to hear your thoughts—cast your vote and let us know what you think could best reduce DUI incidents and make our roads safer!
Read more about these approaches in the two-part story here:
Target Zero: DUI Treatment Court provides intense therapy for high-risk offenders
Clark County's DUI Treatment Court offers intensive therapy to high-risk offenders.
Read more
Vancouver man turns his life around, with help from DUI Treatment Court
Vancouver man Mack White turns his life around through Clark County's DUI Treatment Court.
Read more
Also read:
- Letter: ‘People who have entered illegally must face the consequences of their actions’Vancouver resident Debra Kalz argues the County Council should not pass immigration-related resolutions and says laws must be followed or changed through proper channels.
- Opinion: IBR’s systematic disinformation campaign, its demiseNeighbors for a Better Crossing challenges IBR’s seismic claims and promotes a reuse-and-tunnel alternative they say would save billions at the I-5 crossing.
- Letter: ‘Our forefathers warned us to assemble when government rules over We The People’La Center resident Kimberlee Goheen Elbon criticizes the County Council’s handling of immigration-related meetings and urges residents to assemble and speak out.
- Opinion: ‘County Council meetings have become an embarrassment to our community’Ken Vance criticizes recent Clark County Council meeting conduct and calls for increased security and stronger leadership from Chair Sue Marshall.
- POLL: Did the council’s debate and resolution help unite or divide the community?The Clark County Council’s 3-2 vote to move forward with a modified ICE-related resolution followed heated public comment and sharp debate among councilors.







