
This week’s poll focuses on exploring the best ways to handle high-risk DUI offenders. As detailed in our recent story, the Target Zero DUI Treatment Court is one of the intensive therapy programs designed to address the root causes of dangerous driving behaviors. However, there are other methods to consider, such as increased jail time and fines or mandatory ignition interlock devices to prevent repeat offenses. Some believe that a combination of therapy and traditional penalties might be the most effective solution. We want to hear your thoughts—cast your vote and let us know what you think could best reduce DUI incidents and make our roads safer!
Read more about these approaches in the two-part story here:
Target Zero: DUI Treatment Court provides intense therapy for high-risk offenders
Clark County's DUI Treatment Court offers intensive therapy to high-risk offenders.
Read more
Vancouver man turns his life around, with help from DUI Treatment Court
Vancouver man Mack White turns his life around through Clark County's DUI Treatment Court.
Read more
Also read:
- Opinion: Many important decisions looming as the 2026 session nears the endRep. John Ley outlines budget concerns, energy policy debates and several tax proposals as the 2026 legislative session approaches its final days.
- Opinion: 106 striking workers already using unemployment insurance benefitsA Washington Policy Center analyst says the state’s new law allowing striking workers to collect unemployment benefits is already affecting the UI system.
- POLL: Who should have the primary say in decisions about a student’s gender identity at school?Clark County Today is asking readers who should have the primary role in decisions about a student’s gender identity at school.
- Opinion: Study shows 2025’s record tax increases reduce Washington’s GDP growth and worker payTodd Myers writes that a new economic analysis projects Washington’s 2025 tax increases will slow GDP growth and reduce wages over the next several years.
- Letter: Facts aren’t politicalBrian Kendall writes that disagreements about the LEOFF 1 pension debate should begin with accurate facts rather than misinformation.







