Light rail is part of the new I-5 bridge plan, but who should foot the bill for keeping it running?
As the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program advances, light rail remains a key element—despite ongoing debate in Southwest Washington. Project administrator Greg Johnson says light rail is moving forward with or without C-TRAN funding, but questions remain about who will cover the cost of operations and maintenance. With no final numbers released yet and public opposition still strong in parts of Clark County, should local taxpayers be on the hook? Share your opinion in this week’s poll.
More info:
Interstate Bridge Replacement Program moving forward with plans for light rail
IBR officials updated the C-TRAN Board on Tuesday with light rail plans, as Greg Johnson confirmed direction from both states’ leadership to proceed despite unresolved fu...
Read more
Also read:
- Vancouver amends municipal code, banning pedestrians from staying on traffic islands, medians
Vancouver’s new ordinance targets people who remain on medians, not those crossing legally at crosswalks. - Washington gas prices stay high despite Iran deal as automatic tax hike looms
Washington’s gas tax rises 2% on July 1 under a new inflation-tied annual indexing mechanism. - Letter: The IBR’s concrete obscenity
Bob Ortblad argues $17.7 billion buys one extra lane for five miles — and 30 years of debt for future generations. - Opinion: Legislators demand two auxiliary lanes and challenge light rail plans for I-5 Bridge Replacement
Legislators from both states pressed IBR staff on auxiliary lanes, tolling diversion, and a $7.65 billion cost estimate with no clear path to full funding. - Opinion: Major projects and ODOT’s financial crisis
Joe Cortright tells Oregon Transportation Commission that ODOT’s cost management failures, not fuel efficiency, caused its budget crisis.
wpDiscuz
