Light rail is part of the new I-5 bridge plan, but who should foot the bill for keeping it running?
As the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program advances, light rail remains a key element—despite ongoing debate in Southwest Washington. Project administrator Greg Johnson says light rail is moving forward with or without C-TRAN funding, but questions remain about who will cover the cost of operations and maintenance. With no final numbers released yet and public opposition still strong in parts of Clark County, should local taxpayers be on the hook? Share your opinion in this week’s poll.
More info:
Interstate Bridge Replacement Program moving forward with plans for light rail
IBR officials updated the C-TRAN Board on Tuesday with light rail plans, as Greg Johnson confirmed direction from both states’ leadership to proceed despite unresolved fu...
Read more
Also read:
- POLL: Should federal transportation officials delay approval of the Interstate Bridge replacement project until a new review is completed?
Rep. John Ley urges U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy to delay the $15 billion Interstate Bridge replacement project pending new federal review. - Rep. John Ley asks transportation secretary to deny Record of Decision for I-5 Bridge replacement project
Ley cited scope creep and fiscal irresponsibility in urging Duffy to block the $15 billion bridge ROD. - As summer days approach more construction comes to area roadways
A worker was struck and thrown 20 feet by a distracted driver in a Clark County work zone last summer. - Opinion: Transportation officials may be pivoting as costs explode on interstate bridge replacement
Rail’s share of the I-5 bridge budget may be far larger than the 14% figure officials are citing. - Opinion: IBR program’s $13-17 billion fraud and mismanagement, perpetuated by Vancouver Mayor Anne McEnerny-Ogle and Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek
Gary Clark argues IBR hid a $17B cost estimate from lawmakers while spending up to $280M with no public benefit.
wpDiscuz
