Light rail is part of the new I-5 bridge plan, but who should foot the bill for keeping it running?
As the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program advances, light rail remains a key element—despite ongoing debate in Southwest Washington. Project administrator Greg Johnson says light rail is moving forward with or without C-TRAN funding, but questions remain about who will cover the cost of operations and maintenance. With no final numbers released yet and public opposition still strong in parts of Clark County, should local taxpayers be on the hook? Share your opinion in this week’s poll.
More info:
Interstate Bridge Replacement Program moving forward with plans for light rail
IBR officials updated the C-TRAN Board on Tuesday with light rail plans, as Greg Johnson confirmed direction from both states’ leadership to proceed despite unresolved fu...
Read more
Also read:
- Letter: Interstate Bridge Replacement design is engineered manslaughter
Engineer warns IBR’s planned S-curve approach will create deadly conditions worse than San Francisco’s accident-prone detour. - Opinion: DOT secretary and Maryland governor fire Key Bridge contractor
Maryland fired their bridge contractor over cost concerns while IBR balloons to $18 billion for a shorter span. - Letter: C-TRAN makes a mess of Hazel Dell
Vancouver resident Bob Zak criticizes C-TRAN’s Vine bus system for low ridership and ongoing construction disruptions. - Opinion: Delaying light rail offers best hope for new bridge
Two Republican senators argue light rail should wait until Clark County voters approve funding for operations. - Opinion: Eight reasons the Interstate Bridge project shouldn’t – and can’t legally – move forward
City Observatory analyst identifies eight legal violations in the $15.5 billion Interstate Bridge project.
wpDiscuz
