Light rail is part of the new I-5 bridge plan, but who should foot the bill for keeping it running?
As the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program advances, light rail remains a key element—despite ongoing debate in Southwest Washington. Project administrator Greg Johnson says light rail is moving forward with or without C-TRAN funding, but questions remain about who will cover the cost of operations and maintenance. With no final numbers released yet and public opposition still strong in parts of Clark County, should local taxpayers be on the hook? Share your opinion in this week’s poll.
More info:
Interstate Bridge Replacement Program moving forward with plans for light rail
IBR officials updated the C-TRAN Board on Tuesday with light rail plans, as Greg Johnson confirmed direction from both states’ leadership to proceed despite unresolved fu...
Read more
Also read:
- Opinion: Portland’s War on Cars Part 4 – A smarter automobile strategy to end gridlock
O’Toole argues fuel wasted in Portland-area congestion has sextupled since 1982, generating 250,000 tons of extra greenhouse gases annually. - Opinion: Transit ridership trends are dismal but regional plans are oblivious
Puget Sound transit passenger-miles fell 31% from 2015 to 2024 despite a half-million-resident population increase. - Interstate Bridge Replacement Program seeks qualified firms for bridge replacement contract
The CRBR project is backed by $5.7 billion from state funds, federal grants, and future tolling. - Opinion: Bankrupt – A $3.5 billion Rose Quarter Freeway widening project
Joe Cortright argues ODOT’s Rose Quarter project has grown from a $450M approval to a $3.5B estimate, with a $2B funding gap. - Opinion: Portland’s War on Cars 3 – Ending the war on automobiles
O’Toole argues Portland should add toll lanes, fix safety hazards, and redesign TriMet routes to end its anti-auto policies.
wpDiscuz
