New agreements with affected river users move the I-5 Bridge project closer to a fixed-span design, raising questions about whether 116 feet of clearance is the right solution
Oregon and Washington transportation officials have signed agreements with the four river users identified as impacted by the proposed 116-foot fixed-span I-5 Bridge replacement, clearing a major hurdle as the project heads to the U.S. Coast Guard for review. Supporters say the taller fixed span would eliminate the only “stoplight” on I-5 between Canada and Mexico, improve reliability, and avoid the higher construction and long-term maintenance costs associated with a movable bridge. The agreements — totaling $140 million, paid only if the Coast Guard approves the design and construction begins — are intended to address economic impacts to river users and demonstrate project readiness. With the Coast Guard’s decision expected in early 2026, this week’s poll asks: is a 116-foot fixed span the right choice for the I-5 replacement?
More info:
Agreements reached with four river users identified as impacted by proposed I-5 Bridge replacement
Also read:
- Board authorizes C-TRAN to sign off on Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s SEIS
The C-TRAN Board approved the Final SEIS for the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program, with Camas and Washougal opposing the vote over light rail cost concerns. - C-TRAN ridership grows for fourth consecutive year
C-TRAN ridership topped 5 million trips in 2025, marking the fourth straight year of growth. - Opinion: ‘If they want light rail, they should be the ones who pay for it’
Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance argues that supporters of light rail tied to the I-5 Bridge replacement should bear the local cost of operating and maintaining the system through a narrowly drawn sub-district. - Opinion: IBR falsely blaming inflation
Joe Cortright argues that inflation explains only a small portion of the IBR project’s cost increases and that rising consultant and staff expenses are the primary drivers. - Letter: The Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $141 million bribe can be better spent on sandwich steel-concrete tubes
Bob Ortblad argues that an immersed tunnel using sandwich steel-concrete tubes would be a more cost-effective alternative to the current Interstate Bridge Replacement Program design.
