Oregon officials have a long way to go to sell Clark County residents on tolling

Ken Vance Editorial Clarkcountytoday.com

Area residents and elected officials hear from Oregon representatives Tuesday

VANCOUVER — Clark County residents and elected officials had a chance to hear from representatives from the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and a partnering consultant Tuesday night on Oregon’s attempt to place tolls on I-5 and I-205.

Hopefully, you’re aware that last summer, the Oregon Legislature passed a $5.3 billion transportation package in an attempt to put a dent in the many needs that state has to address in its infrastructure. You should also remember that transportation package did not target any funds for new crossings or corridors over the Columbia River. It also did not include any plans for new capacity (lanes) on I-5 and I-205.

If Oregon officials get their way, Washington residents could be paying tolls when they cross the I-5 bridge in the future. Photo by Mike Schultz
If Oregon officials get their way, Washington residents could be paying tolls when they cross the I-5 bridge in the future. Photo by Mike Schultz

As part of Oregon’s plan to pay for this transportation package is the intent to place tolls on I-5 and I-205 somewhere between the south side of the Columbia River and Tualatin, where I-5 and I-205 converge.

In order to finalize their proposal to the federal government, expected by the end of the year, Oregon’s elected officials and leaders formed a Value Pricing Policy Advisory Committee, which is three meetings into a six-meeting schedule that is expected to produce a recommendation to the Oregon Transportation Commission sometime early this summer.

On the 25-person committee, sits just three members from Southwest Washington — Vancouver Mayor Anne-McEnerny-Ogle, County Councilor Eileen Quiring and a representation from the Washington Department of Transportation. It’s an understatement to say that the deck is stacked against us.

Tuesday’s presentation in front of the Clark County Council hasn’t been the only effort by Oregon officials to reach out to Clark County leaders and residents. An Open House was hosted by ODOT in Vancouver in January.

If the idea of tolls on I-5 and I-205 wasn’t so infuriating and unfair, I might be amused by the effort of the Oregon officials to sell Clark County residents on the “benefits’’ of the proposed tolls. That effort reminds me of a job I had for one day while I was in college.

In my younger years, hopefully it’s no longer the case, I could be sold a bill of goods, especially when it came to prospective job opportunities. As is the case for most college students, I was broke much of the time so I was always looking for a way to make things easier. I responded to some employment advertisement that made it sound like I would just be taking order upon order from consumers who couldn’t live without some magical, unidentified product.

When I arrived for the interview, it was at a private house in North Portland with more cats than I could count. I spent about 10 minutes with my prospective “boss,’’ who proceeded to hand me a script I could use to make cold calls straight out of the telephone directory in an attempt to make appointments for him to try to sell encyclopedias. The carrot that he dangled in front of me was that if I did a good enough job making cold calls, that someday I might be able to sell encyclopedias myself.

My ‘’boss’’ handed me the script and a thick phone directory and left me alone in his home to make my cold calls. I will never forget the sickness I felt in my stomach when during my first call, the person on the other line hung up 10 seconds into my nervous reading of the script. Needless to say, I didn’t experience the “benefits’’ of that particular job opportunity.

The script Oregon officials are reading to Clark County leaders and residents is even worse than the one I was forced to read some 25 years ago.

“How do we mean ‘benefit?” Stewart asked the Oregon officials during the presentation. “We’re going to have Clark County citizens paying tolls, and getting no more capacity on the freeway.

“We are shifting costs to Clark County residents,” Stewart said. “That will really have no benefit whatsoever. So we can call it Value Pricing, which is so ridiculous it’s insulting. The ‘value’ is going to be on the Oregon side. There is no value to our citizens that are going to be paying these tolls.”

Oregon’s effort essentially boils down to trying to get us to change our driving habits during peak congestion hours, or to try to get us completely out of our cars altogether.

“They have a large body of water to cross,” said Quiring, who has been an outspoken critic of Oregon’s tolling proposal. “I don’t think people from Washington, during commuting hours, are using that freeway. They already know they can’t go anywhere. They’re sitting in their car and idling for long periods of time. So I think people have already chosen not to go during commuting hours.”

Carol Levanen, executive secretary of Clark County Citizens United, summed up the thoughts of many Clark County residents, myself included.

“It seems arrogant for the state of Oregon to think that they have total control of that I-5 corridor through their state,” Levanan said, “and it seems kind of arrogant of the Legislature of Oregon to think that they’re going to decide the life of all of the people beyond this state.”

For a full report of Tuesday’s meeting, please read reporter Chris Brown’s account, which includes a link to the video of the meeting:

We'd love to hear your comments!

About The Author

Ken Vance got his start in the newspaper industry in 1987 as a reporter at The Columbian Newspaper in Vancouver. Vance graduated from Stevenson High School in Stevenson, WA, and attended Clark College in Vancouver. He worked for The Columbian from 1987-2001. He was most recently a staff member of The Reflector Newspaper in Battle Ground, where he served as editor since 2010 and reporter since 2007. Vance’s work in the newspaper industry has won him multiple awards, including a first place award from the Society of Professional Journalists for in-depth reporting.

Related posts