
They argue the new taxes are needed to maintain highway and ferry infrastructure, yet politicians furthered their efforts to tax drivers and divert a large share of those taxes to other purposes
Bob Pishue
Mountain States Policy Center
Washington state lawmakers this year increased the cost to both buy a vehicle and fill the gas tank, adding an additional 0.2% sales tax to car purchases and a $0.06 per gallon tax increase on fuel. They argue the new taxes are needed to maintain highway and ferry infrastructure, yet politicians furthered their efforts to tax drivers and divert a large share of those taxes to other purposes.
While an attempt was also made again to tax drivers by the mile to divert money, lawmakers “[waved] the white flag” on the issue this legislative session. This mileage tax will likely resurface again. The transportation tax bill currently sits on Gov. Bob Ferguson’s desk for signature.
The new transportation spending can be found in Senate Bill 5161, a nearly $16 billion tax package based on increases in the fuel tax, license fees, and other taxes. The most notable, and controversial, project is funding the I-5 Bridge replacement, an estimated $5.4 billion bridge connecting Vancouver, Wash. to Portland, Ore. Light rail has been a controversy on the proposal, comprising nearly 40% of the project cost, yet it is estimated to carry just 2.4% of trip demand across the bridge. The Seattle area is facing a similar position, as many officials there support an expensive West Seattle connection that would only increase transit mode share across the bridge by 1 percent.
At a time when DOGE (the Department of Government Efficiency) is in full swing at the federal level, state and local lawmakers are still eyeing big projects that promise to do little.
Should the governor sign the bill, Washington state will continue to be less business and family-friendly than its Mountain States neighbors. Since 1980, Washington state has raised the gas tax in 13 of 44 years, and the state tax on gasoline will now reach 55.4 cents per gallon, keeping it among the highest in the country, even without the added cap and trade tax. This higher gas tax will also be indexed to inflation, ensuring year-over-year increases in taxes are built into the price of gas. For comparison, Idaho’s gas tax is 32 cents and Montana’s is 33 cents per gallon.
Lawmakers also raised the sales tax on cars and recreational vehicles. Even though the state sales tax is currently 6.5% on retail sales, the state also imposes a special 0.3% sales tax rate on car sales for non-highway purposes. Lawmakers increased that special sales tax to 0.5%. Heavier vehicles will also see increases in annual registration fees – for cars 4,000-6,000 pounds, for example, annual fees will increase 36%, from $55 per year to $75.
Even if you don’t own a vehicle and use ridesharing services or rent a car, expect your trip to get more expensive. Lawmakers increased the rideshare tax to 11.9%. Other fees, like tire disposal fees, driver’s license fees, title and registration fees, and filing fees, also increased.
In sum, expect driving to cost even more time and money in the Evergreen State. While Washington does have immense transportation needs, diverting driver fees to other modes or to subsidize light rail across the Columbia River opens the opportunity for road projects to continue to languish.
A recent Reason Foundation report showed Washington state highways ranked 47th in cost-effectiveness and performance in the country, receiving poor ranks in spending per mile and pavement condition in urban and rural areas. Traffic congestion also continues to build across the state, with Seattle ranking 10th in the country in time lost due to traffic in 2024.
Bob Pishue is a policy analyst at Mountain States Policy Center, an independent research organization based in Idaho, Montana, Eastern Washington and Wyoming. Online at mountainstatespolicy.org.
Also read:
- Opinion: ‘If they want light rail, they should be the ones who pay for it’Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance argues that supporters of light rail tied to the I-5 Bridge replacement should bear the local cost of operating and maintaining the system through a narrowly drawn sub-district.
- Opinion: IBR falsely blaming inflationJoe Cortright argues that inflation explains only a small portion of the IBR project’s cost increases and that rising consultant and staff expenses are the primary drivers.
- Letter: The Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $141 million bribe can be better spent on sandwich steel-concrete tubesBob Ortblad argues that an immersed tunnel using sandwich steel-concrete tubes would be a more cost-effective alternative to the current Interstate Bridge Replacement Program design.
- A sub-district vote could be a way to go to pay O&M costs associated with light railClark County Council members heard details on how a voter-approved C-TRAN sub-district could be created to fund long-term operations and maintenance costs for light rail tied to a new Interstate Bridge.
- Letter: British Columbia’s new immersed tunnel can solve Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $17.7 billion problemBob Ortblad argues that an immersed tunnel similar to a project underway in British Columbia could significantly reduce costs and impacts associated with the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program.






