Target Zero Manager Doug Dahl answers the question of how can an officer know when someone is too high to drive?
Doug Dahl
The Wise Drive
Q: We have a limit for driving with alcohol in your system, and we have a limit for cannabis, but what about all the other drugs? Why don’t we have limits for them? How can an officer know when someone is too high to drive?
A: Right up front, I want to make something clear. Washington does not have a legal limit on how much alcohol you can drink and then drive. Yes, we have a 0.08 blood alcohol content (BAC) per se limit. But that doesn’t mean anyone below that number is sober. Per se is Latin for “by itself” and, in the context of impaired driving, means that driving with a BAC level of 0.08 or greater is sufficient, without any other evidence, to be guilty of “Driving while under the influence.”
You can be impaired below the per se limit; quite a bit below it. The effects of alcohol are apparent at 0.02 BAC, and at 0.05 BAC a driver more than doubles their risk of a crash. That’s why most industrial nations (and Utah) have per se limits of 0.05 or lower.
I point all this out because in a recent survey nearly a quarter of Washington drivers believed (incorrectly) that they couldn’t be impaired below a 0.08 BAC. That’s also why an appropriate per se law matters. When people don’t understand the law they’ll misinterpret a per se limit as a legal limit and may make risky driving decisions based on flawed information.
Regardless of a driver’s BAC limit, the law says a person is guilty of DUI if they drive “under the influence of or affected by intoxicating liquor, cannabis, or any drug,” or a combination of drugs and/or alcohol. Here’s a minimalist summary of our DUI law: If you consume a substance that affects your ability to drive, don’t drive. This includes alcohol, cannabis, illegal drugs, and prescription medications. That also gets us to your actual question.
If the standard for DUI is being “under the influence or affected” by a drug, it’s important for an officer to be able to recognize what drug impairment looks like. They can’t just tell the judge, “He looked high to me,” and expect it to fly in court. Instead, they need to rely on their training and experience to identify specific characteristics of impairment, depending on the category of drug that a person has used.
For many officers in Washington that training is a class called Advanced Roadside Impaired Driver Enforcement (ARIDE). To condense 16 hours of training to a short (and incomplete) description, ARIDE trains officers on the seven categories of drugs, how each category affects the systems in the human body, and how to recognize indicators of impairment associated with each category.
For example, the category of central nervous system (CNS) stimulants includes cocaine and methamphetamine (illegal) as well as Adderall and Ritalin (legal when used as prescribed.) Common indicators of use (from a list of nearly 20 indicators) include dilated pupils, slow reaction to light, elevated body temperature, tense muscles, euphoria, and exaggerated reflexes. If you’re curious about the effects of different categories of drugs, you can find a chart at thewisedrive.com by searching on the site for “drug categories and their effects.”
We also have officers with more advanced training, called Drug Recognition Experts (DREs). They’re able to administer in-depth evaluations to drivers impaired by drugs. When an ARIDE-trained officer recognizes a drug-impaired driver, they may call for a DRE to assist with the investigation. Bottom line: a trained officer can spot the indicators that someone is “too high to drive.”
Also read:
- Letter: The Great Reversal – Cortes cuts local taxes, then loads schools and hospitals with unfunded state mandates
Shauna Walters argues that Sen. Adrian Cortes has reversed his local anti-tax record by supporting state mandates and new taxes in Olympia. - Letter: Part One – Inside Ridgefield School District’s failure to protect students
A Ridgefield parent and Rob Anderson describe how student complaints against a high school coach were handled by the school district. - Opinion: Business is already leaving Washington
Mark Harmsworth argues that recent and proposed tax policies are pushing Washington businesses to consider leaving the state. - Opinion: The income tax proposal has arrived
Ryan Frost of the Washington Policy Center argues that a proposed Washington income tax creates a new revenue stream rather than delivering tax reform or relief. - Opinion: ‘If they want light rail, they should be the ones who pay for it’
Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance argues that supporters of light rail tied to the I-5 Bridge replacement should bear the local cost of operating and maintaining the system through a narrowly drawn sub-district.
