Ridgefield School District has partially created its own capacity and overcrowding issues, according to Ridgefield resident Heidi Pozzo

Heidi Pozzo 
for Clark County Today

Ridgefield School District has partially created its own capacity and overcrowding issues. In a prior article, I walked through a series of decisions the District made that impacted capacity related to the last bond.  

Since then, the district has made more decisions that impact overcrowding. We need to understand those decisions so they are not repeated in the future. 

In 2021-2022, Union Ridge Elementary School was 22 percent overcapacity and South Ridge Elementary School was 5 percent over. So the district understandably wanted to address the issue and rebalanced enrollment so the students were spread equally across schools. But the schools don’t have the same capacity. 

Rebalancing put South Ridge 33 percent over capacity while Union Ridge dropped to 9 percent over capacity. The numbers don’t tell the whole story though. Union Ridge has an elementary school-sized gym and a middle school-sized gym, as well as two play areas. South Ridge has one elementary school-sized gym and one play area.  

It is much more difficult for South Ridge to handle having its enrollment pushed so far over capacity than Union Ridge because it is a significantly smaller overall facility. 

As the district contemplates rebalancing enrollment for a third elementary school, the plan is to spread students evenly across schools once again. Only this time, the rebalancing will create a significantly higher strain on South Ridge than the other schools.  

By spreading students evenly across schools, Union Ridge and the new elementary will have significant room for growth. South Ridge, however, will only have room for 42 more students before reaching capacity. And South Ridge is the school that has been growing the fastest. 

By not looking at growth rates and capacity for each school, the district has been driving overcrowding at South Ridge. 

To be clear, as I’ve stated in the past, there is a need for another elementary school. The existing elementary schools have reached the point where it is difficult to manage the populations. However, there are a number of issues with the proposed school and the propositions that are up for a vote.  

Whichever path the voters choose, the district should keep growth rates, school design and capacity in mind to not unfairly burden any one school. 

Heidi Pozzo has been a Ridgefield resident for 16 years. She is a concerned citizen who would like students to get a good education and thinks we can do it in a more cost-effective way.

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: Neighbors for a Better Crossing urges Oregon Legislators to demand full audit of IBR project, echoing Washington’s HB 2669
  Gary Clark of Neighbors for a Better Crossing urges Oregon lawmakers to pursue an audit of the Interstate Bridge Replacement project similar to Washington’s HB 2669 proposal.
• 
  Opinion: Climate Commitment Act – Washington’s hidden carbon tax hits hard
  Opinion, columns, Washington state, Climate Commitment Act, CCA Washington, Washington carbon tax debate, Washington gas prices, Nancy Churchill, Dangerous Rhetoric, Washington climate policy, Washington fuel costs, Travis Couture, Washington Department of Ecology, Washington Department of Commerce, Washington carbon credit auctions, Washington cap and trade program, Washington environmental policy
• 
  Letter: The Missing Skamania Report – The prosecuting attorney is still sitting on it
  Rob Anderson questions why an investigative report into potential County Charter and OPMA violations has not received an outside review after being declined by multiple offices.
• 
  Opinion: Washington’s charter schools deliver – if the state lets them
  Vicki Murray argues that Washington’s charter schools are posting stronger academic results than comparable peers while facing funding inequities that are shrinking the sector.
• 
  Letter: IBR’s money pit
  Bob Ortblad argues the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program is withholding a higher cost estimate while moving forward with limited funding and an unclear construction timeline.