Elizabeth New (Hovde) believes passage of I-2124 should motivate lawmakers to find real solutions for our graying population that aren’t built on the backs of workers, including low-income ones
Elizabeth New (Hovde)
Washington Policy Center
I was invited to write two opinion pieces about Initiative 2124 for The Seattle Times and The Spokesman-Review. Both were published this past weekend to offer readers different perspectives on a Nov. 5 ballot measure that would make a payroll tax and participation in the WA Cares program optional.
These guest columns highlight different things about the trouble with WA Cares and the value of I-2124, so if you are interested in the initiative and how it could impact workers, read them both here and here.
What is highlighted in each opinion piece is that WA Cares is harming low-income workers, that many workers are not going to see a monetary benefit even after years of paying into the fund — and even sometimes if they need long-term care — and that lawmakers who support WA Cares admit the program is broken. Still, they haven’t been able to fix the 2019 legislation that created WA Cares. That’s because WA Cares is misguided from start to finish.
Taxpayers should support safety nets for people in need. Luckily, they already do support a safety net for people in financial need of long-term care: Medicaid. But the safety net is being misused, causing headaches for state budget writers and bringing a high cost to taxpayers.
Passage of I-2124 should motivate lawmakers to find real solutions for our graying population that aren’t built on the backs of workers, including low-income ones. Priority-based budgeting, Medicaid reform, increased choice and awareness about long-term care are needed, not WA Cares.
Read Elizabeth New (Hovde) Citizen’s Guide to I-2124 here.
Elizabeth New (Hovde) is a policy analyst and director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- Opinion: Tax day is painful enough without Washington adding its own
Washington’s new 9.9% income tax mirrors federal pattern: start narrow, expand to hit everyone within years. - POLL: What do you believe is the biggest reason school districts are facing budget shortfalls?
Districts across Washington warn of budget gaps as debate grows over rising costs versus inadequate state funding. - Opinion: The high cost of hiding – Why IBR’s delayed revenue study is a $15 billion warning sign
IBR delays critical toll revenue analysis until June 2027, hiding financial details until after project approval. - Opinion: The high cost of hiding – Why IBR’s delayed revenue study is a $15 billion warning sign
IBR delays critical toll revenue analysis until June 2027, hiding financial details until after project approval. - Opinion: Washington fails the test for affordability
Mountain States Policy Center analysis reveals Washington ranks 5th most expensive state as residents migrate to Idaho and Texas.
