
Mark Harmsworth says policymakers should reject this bill and embrace policies that empower businesses to respond to market signals, ensuring abundance and affordability for all Washingtonians
Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center
House Bill 2481 (HB 2481), introduced by Representative Mary Fosse (D), represents a misguided attempt to limit the free-market under the guise of consumer protection. Titled “Prohibiting surveillance-based price discrimination and surge pricing for retail goods,” HB 2481 would ban businesses from using data-driven algorithms to adjust prices based on demand, consumer behavior, or real-time market conditions. It mandates uniform pricing and imposes a four-year moratorium on electronic shelf label systems in stores larger than 15,000 square feet. Violations would be treated as unfair practices under the Consumer Protection Act, exposing businesses to lawsuits and penalties.

For businesses that rely on market-demand pricing, such as grocers optimizing inventory during peak times, this legislation would spell disaster. When demand spikes, like during holidays or supply disruptions, allowing prices to rise signals suppliers to increase production and delivery. Banning this flexibility could lead to chronic shortages, as seen in regulated markets where fixed prices discourage restocking. Imagine empty shelves for essentials because suppliers can’t justify the extra effort without compensating margins. Washington’s grocers, already squeezed by thin margins (often 1-2%), would face higher operational costs to maintain steady supplies, ultimately passing those burdens onto consumers through elevated baseline prices.
HB 2481’s broad definitions exacerbate the problem. “Surveillance pricing” is poorly defined and the moratorium on electronic shelves ignores how these tools reduce labor costs for manual updates and enable quick adjustments to wholesale changes. Larger retailers, excluded from small-business exemptions, will shoulder compliance headaches, including audits and legal risks, diverting resources from growth and hiring.
HB 2481 is not price protection. It is government overreach that distorts markets and punishes adaptability. In a state grappling with inflation and supply chain woes, HB 2481 could worsen access to goods, deter investment, and favor out-of-state competitors unbound by these rules.
Policymakers should reject this bill and embrace policies that empower businesses to respond to market signals, ensuring abundance and affordability for all Washingtonians.
Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Former WA Supreme Court justice joins legal effort against income taxPhil Talmadge and Rob McKenna have joined forces with the Citizens Action Defense Fund to oppose Washington’s new tax on high-income earners, raising legal and constitutional questions.
- Makeover in store for Congress with flood of lawmakers headed for the exitsA wave of exits from Congress—over 65 lawmakers—will usher in unfamiliar faces and decrease veteran expertise, shifting the political landscape in Washington.
- Opinion: Sheriffs fight backFour county sheriffs are suing to block a new law giving a governor-appointed board power to decertify and remove sheriffs, bypassing voter oversight in Washington.
- Obituary for Lucille ‘Erma’ Christenson Madore – April 22,1924-March 13, 2026Known for her love of music and family, Lucille ‘Erma’ Christenson Madore lived through nearly 102 years and leaves a large, grateful legacy in Vancouver.
- Fiscal fallout: $375 million bond debt indirectly funding operating budgetShifting $375 million from a loan fund impacts local infrastructure as Washington state covers operating costs with bond debt, prompting concern among officials and advocacy groups.
- Lawsuit aims to block new eligibility requirements for WA sheriffsFour sheriffs are suing over a state law that sets new eligibility rules, arguing it undermines voter authority by allowing removal for certification issues.
- Opinion: The growing gap between public voice and political powerTodd Myers describes how large-scale protest and sign-ins often fail to sway state leaders, and argues authentic influence is most likely found through local action.








