
Mark Harmsworth says policymakers should reject this bill and embrace policies that empower businesses to respond to market signals, ensuring abundance and affordability for all Washingtonians
Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center
House Bill 2481 (HB 2481), introduced by Representative Mary Fosse (D), represents a misguided attempt to limit the free-market under the guise of consumer protection. Titled “Prohibiting surveillance-based price discrimination and surge pricing for retail goods,” HB 2481 would ban businesses from using data-driven algorithms to adjust prices based on demand, consumer behavior, or real-time market conditions. It mandates uniform pricing and imposes a four-year moratorium on electronic shelf label systems in stores larger than 15,000 square feet. Violations would be treated as unfair practices under the Consumer Protection Act, exposing businesses to lawsuits and penalties.

For businesses that rely on market-demand pricing, such as grocers optimizing inventory during peak times, this legislation would spell disaster. When demand spikes, like during holidays or supply disruptions, allowing prices to rise signals suppliers to increase production and delivery. Banning this flexibility could lead to chronic shortages, as seen in regulated markets where fixed prices discourage restocking. Imagine empty shelves for essentials because suppliers can’t justify the extra effort without compensating margins. Washington’s grocers, already squeezed by thin margins (often 1-2%), would face higher operational costs to maintain steady supplies, ultimately passing those burdens onto consumers through elevated baseline prices.
HB 2481’s broad definitions exacerbate the problem. “Surveillance pricing” is poorly defined and the moratorium on electronic shelves ignores how these tools reduce labor costs for manual updates and enable quick adjustments to wholesale changes. Larger retailers, excluded from small-business exemptions, will shoulder compliance headaches, including audits and legal risks, diverting resources from growth and hiring.
HB 2481 is not price protection. It is government overreach that distorts markets and punishes adaptability. In a state grappling with inflation and supply chain woes, HB 2481 could worsen access to goods, deter investment, and favor out-of-state competitors unbound by these rules.
Policymakers should reject this bill and embrace policies that empower businesses to respond to market signals, ensuring abundance and affordability for all Washingtonians.
Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Leslie Lewallen stays and fights for Washington as director of Future 42 Clark CountyFormer Camas City Councilor Leslie Lewallen is leading the Clark County chapter of Future 42, a new organization focused on policy advocacy, accountability, and engaging persuadable voters at the local and state level.
- Opinion: ‘Seeking might over right destroys representative government’Retired judge Dave Larson argues that prioritizing political power over constitutional principles has undermined representative government and calls for renewed civic responsibility.
- Letter: ‘Immigration’ resolution scheduled for this Wednesday at Clark County Council MeetingRob Anderson urges residents to closely watch an upcoming Clark County Council meeting where an immigration-related resolution and proposed rule changes are expected to be discussed.
- Opinion: The 1700-square-foot solution to Washington’s housing crisisAn opinion column arguing that Washington’s energy code has driven up housing costs and outlining how HB 2486 aims to limit those impacts for smaller, more affordable homes.
- Rep. John Ley’s new bill calls for an independent audit of Interstate 5 Bridge Replacement ProjectRep. John Ley introduced legislation requiring an independent audit of the Interstate 5 Bridge Replacement Project to review costs, management, and oversight.
- Letter: Public school visionClark County resident Larry Roe urges a deeper community discussion about public school priorities, levy funding, and the long-term affordability of education for local families.
- County Charter Review Commission sets meeting schedule, selects officersThe Clark County Charter Review Commission set a weekly meeting schedule beginning Feb. 4 and selected officers as it begins its review of the county charter.








