
Mark Harmsworth believes that until the definition of ‘reasonably expects’ is clarified, House Bill 1402 should not be passed
Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center
House Bill 1402 (HB 1402), introduced by Representative Scott (D), would prohibit an employer from requiring a driver license unless the employer reasonably expects driving to be an essential part of the job function and alternate, cost and travel time equivalent methods of performing a job function are not available.

In principle HB 1402 is not a bad policy and could open up more opportunities for job applicants. However, the language of the bill is ambiguous, particularly the definition of ‘reasonably expects’. This is the term used to define if the license requirement is valid. Failure to comply opens up employers to potential litigation. An employer may inadvertently or unintentionally include a driver’s license requirement for a job, particularly in retail or hospitality jobs. HB 1402 currently will create more problems than it solves.
The bill would put into law;
It is an unfair practice under the Washington Law Against Discrimination for an employer to include a statement in a job advertisement, posting, application, or other material that an applicant must have a valid driver’s license, unless:
- the employer reasonably expects driving to be an essential job function;
- and the employer reasonably believes it would not be comparable in travel time or cost to use an alternative form of transportation, including a ride hailing service, using a taxi, carpooling, bicycling, walking, or transit.
The definition of ‘reasonably expects’ needs a much clearer definition, with no ambiguity, so business owners can advertise jobs to attract the widest set of qualified applicants without fear of litigation.
Until the definition of ‘reasonably expects’ is clarified, House Bill 1402 should not be passed.
Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Opinion: Income Tax Battle Round Two – Signatures neededLet’s Go Washington needs 300,000+ signatures in under two months to put IP26-645 on the fall ballot.
- Letter: Climate Commitment Act critique rests on fossil-funded denialAnthony Teso argues CCA repeal would transfer savings to Chevron and BP, not working families.
- Letter: Why Petition IP26-645 is a stand for the people, not a political partyIP26-645 needs 400,000 signatures by July 2 to repeal Washington’s new income-based tax.
- Opinion: An important reason to keep the I-5 freeway system toll-freeSharon Nasset argues fuel tax sends 100% to transportation, while tolling sends only 60% of net funds.
- Letter: Camas Voters – Keep your strong mayorGary Perman argues Camas insiders behind the government shift review helped craft a bond voters rejected by nearly 90%.







