Elizabeth Hovde explains that HB 2295 and SB 6101 would give the state more solutions for freeing up needed acute-care beds
Elizabeth Hovde
Washington Policy Center
Getting hospital services at home? A lot of us would like that and have homes conducive to such a setup. Being in your familiar surroundings is working for the patients who have taken part in the optional programs, physicians testify in legislative committees that they like the access solution, and hospitals trying such a program have seen good health outcomes. Win-win-win.
This idea was made possible with a federal waiver in COVID-19 times, and it will expire soon. States need to decide whether to continue the hospital programs. That is what legislation moving in the House and Senate would accomplish.
HB 2295 and SB 6101 would give the state more solutions for freeing up needed acute-care beds. We need those.
Such a program respects patient decisions, offers flexibility in our health care system and is being done in a way that keeps health care quality high. Hospitals report good outcomes, including low readmission and escalation rates, better discharge times and high patient satisfaction.
I’m hopeful the bill makes it through the House and Senate largely unscathed, avoiding additional micromanagement of services hospitals are supplying in homes. Hospital-at-home programs are seeing success in our state and others. If the programs aren’t broken, let’s not make it harder for hospitals and patients to see and experience continued success.
Watch the House Health Care and Wellness Committee hearing where the proposal was considered, and where I offered testimony, on Wednesday.
Elizabeth Hovde is a policy analyst and the director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- Opinion: Restore Election Confidence Initiative signature-gathering effort nears deadlineThe Restore Election Confidence (REC) Initiative is in its final stage of signature gathering, with a deadline set for May 25, 2024.
- Opinion: Would the passage of Initiative 2124 kill WA Cares?Elizabeth New (Hovde) believes it’s likely that if the state’s new, mandatory long-term-care program was made optional for Washington state workers many would flee, leaving it unable to pay its way in its current form.
- Opinion: Making sense of filing weekThe week of May 6 to 10 was filing week in Washington state.
- Opinion: For the love of mom, vote yes on I-2124Let’s Go Washington Press Secretary Hallie Balch offers support for Initiative 2124, the Opt Out of State-Run Long Term Care Coverage Act.
- POLL: Do you support Initiative 2124, which would make participation in WA Cares optional?Do you support Initiative 2124, which would make participation in WA Cares optional?