Todd Myers offers an assessment on the governor’s record on decisions and actions impacting salmon populations across Washington state
Washington Policy Center
Over the last decade, salmon populations across Washington state have stagnated, making virtually no progress toward recovery. That news has not reached Governor Inslee’s spokesman Mike Faulk, who recently pointed to salmon recovery as an area of success.
Responding to questions about Governor Inslee’s record from KING 5 TV reporter Susannah Frame, the governor’s spokesman Mike Faulk offered several excuses. He complained that Frame’s “focus is on a small piece of the policy pie, not the governor’s whole strategy.” Instead, one of the things Faulk said people should look at is the governor’s record on “salmon restoration,” which he insinuated is going well.
This is completely inaccurate. Let’s look at the record.
Start with the assessment of the Governor’s Salmon Recovery Office (GSRO). The GSRO tracks progress on salmon recovery with the “State of Salmon in Watersheds” report. the executive summary from the 2022 report notes, “Salmon continue to struggle in Washington. No salmon species have been removed from the federal Endangered Species Act list in Washington and most of the species on the list are in crisis or not keeping pace with recovery goals.” This assessment is notably worse than in 2012 when the GSRO report noted, “In most areas of the state, fish are increasing or staying the same while in a few areas, fish are slightly decreasing.”
NOAA Fisheries, which monitors the status of threatened species, notes that over the past decade, most salmon populations in Puget Sound are getting worse. The most recent assessment, covering the 15-year period between 2004-19 found that “trends were negative” for 16 of the 22 Puget Sound salmon populations. NOAA scientists wrote, “there is a general decline in natural-origin spawner abundance across all [major population groups] in the most-recent fifteen years.”
The Puget Sound Partnership also missed its 2020 targets for recovering Chinook salmon. The goal to “start seeing improvements in wild Chinook abundance in 2-4 populations in each biogeographic region” was missed. The Partnership’s assessment found that, “Improvements, measured in terms of population abundance increases, were very small and the 25-75th CIs overlapped zero, suggesting no change in any populations’ abundance.” No change.
Salmon populations simply aren’t recovering in Washington state. Claiming that salmon restoration is a success is baseless and contrary to the data from the governor’s own agencies.
Earlier this year we identified four actions that will help get salmon recovery back on track in the state. But step one in every recovery process is “admit you have a problem.” Governor Inslee and his spokesman continue to be in denial about their failures and the price is being paid by salmon and the orca, tribes, and the sport and commercial fishers who rely on abundant salmon populations.
Todd Myers is the director of the Center for the Environment at the Washington Policy Center.
- Importance of open government laws on display with shocking storiesJason Mercier of the Mountain States Policy Center discusses two recent stories that illustrate the lengths that some public officials will go to evade public accountability.
- POLL: Should voters be given the opportunity to decide a proposed repeal of provisions of the 2021 Washington Climate Commitment Act?Should voters be given the opportunity to decide a proposed repeal of provisions of the 2021 Washington Climate Commitment Act?
- Opinion: Three keys to making sure regulations don’t suffocate citizens and the economyChris Cargill of the Mountain States Policy Center explains that whether they are at the local, state or federal level, all laws and regulations have a cost.
- Opinion: 2024 – A year for political actionNancy Churchill points out that everyday Washingtonians are experiencing runaway inflation coupled with rapidly rising taxes.
- Opinion: Study shows bias in Washington State Supreme Court donations and decisionsChris Corry of the Washington Policy Center says the results of the recent study are not surprising because a statewide vote elects the Washington State Supreme Court.