For every $1 of subsidy from Washington’s taxpayers – who care deeply about the environment — for every dollar spent, taxpayers received just over a penny’s worth of environmental benefit

David Boze
Washington Policy Center

The Washington Policy Center released an analysis of the data from our state’s Electric Vehicle subsidy program.  The biggest takeaway? For every $1 of subsidy from Washington’s taxpayers – who care deeply about the environment — for every dollar spent, taxpayers received just over a penny’s worth of environmental benefit. Yet at a time when our Legislature is entertaining higher taxes to make the budget balance, former Governor Inslee’s outgoing budget proposal included millions of dollars to expand this program.

That is the opposite of accountability. The opposite of responsible government.  As people struggle to make ends meet, they expect their government to deliver efficiently the services and benefits they’ve been promised.

You can read the whole study here (or just the key takeaways below). One thing to watch for is how our regional media treats this news.  Will they be as interested in the actual results of the program as they were creating headlines for the political promises creating it?

Local media suffers from many challenges — aggregate sites, online expectations of free news, a loss of trust, but local media are still a key aspect for political accountability – especially when one party is dominant and doesn’t have to fear losing to the opposition. So if our regional media doesn’t show interest in whether programs achieve the results promised (or anything close to it), expect politicians to remain more interested in attention-getting promises than getting results.  That said, Governor Ferguson’s inaugural remarks provide hope he might be interested in setting the state on a more productive path than programs like the EV subsidy.

If you’re not already a subscriber to WPC’s weekly newsletter, empower yourself with the information you need and subscribe now, then read the key findings of the EV report below.

1. Based on sales trends, the rebates increased new EV sales by an estimated 3,477, used sales by about 1,163 and electric trucks by about 187, for a total of 4,788. This is well below the Department of Commerce’s initial projection of up to 8,767 additional vehicles. Sales of new PHEVs actually fell by an estimated 344 vehicles but used PHEV sales increased by 305 vehicles.
    
2. As a result of the lower sales, the CO2 reductions are much smaller than expected, reducing lifetime emissions by only 13,030 metric tons – equivalent to about 0.03% of Washington’s annual transportation-related emissions.
    
3. The cost of the program to reduce emissions is astronomical, costing $3,453.57 to reduce one metric ton of CO2 – nearly 86 times as much as the state’s current CO2 price. For every $1 of subsidy, the people of Washington receive just over a penny’s worth of environmental benefit.
    
4. During the three months when the rebates were in effect, the average household income of the zip codes where rebate-eligible EVs were sold was $118,816. That is only a slight decline from an average household income of $122,601 in the months before the rebates were available.
    
5. The most popular vehicle among those who used the rebate was the Tesla Model 3, which saw sales double, selling 1,191 more vehicles than expected based on sales in 2024 prior to the rebates.
    
6. Through October, EVs and plug-in hybrids accounted for 21.8% of new vehicle sales in Washington, only slightly above the 2023 level of 20.5% and well below the 35% level that will be required in 2026.

Read the full study here. 

David Boze is the communications and marketing director for the Washington Policy Center.

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: In-n-Out Burger is so much more than fast food for so many of us
  Paul Valencia shares why In-n-Out Burger means more than just fast food for countless fans as Ridgefield nears its grand opening and Vancouver’s location begins construction.
• 
  Opinion: Washington’s June 2025 budget revisions – revenue up spending up more
  Mark Harmsworth of the Washington Policy Center critiques the state’s latest budget revisions, warning that new taxes—not organic growth—are driving revenue. He calls for fiscal restraint and long-term reform.
• 
  Opinion: Pedestrian control signals
  Doug Dahl explains Washington state law regarding crosswalks and pedestrian signals, offering safety insights and common misunderstandings about traffic control at intersection
• 
  Letter: ‘How can five part-time legislators without research support or reliable access to information serve as an effective check on six full-time elected executives’
  Bob Zak expresses agreement with recent opinions on the Clark County Charter’s imbalance and endorses John Ley’s transit preference while questioning light rail costs and Council effectiveness.
• 
  POLL: Should the Clark County Clerk remain an elected position?
  Following public opposition, Clark County Council dropped a proposal to make the clerk an appointed role. Readers can now weigh in through this week’s poll on whether the clerk should remain elected.