Vancouver resident Ann Donnelly offers her perspective on the Clark County Republican Party’s decision not to recognize Third Congressional District candidate

Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com

I agree with Julia Dawn Seaver’s assessment of the vote Republican PCOs took recently to deny “recognition as a Republican” to long-time noted Republican Leslie Lewallen. That vote will harm Joe Kent and the entire Republican Party. It already has done so. I hear other Republicans and Independents in our community commenting on such an unrealistic and narrow-minded move. Democrats supporting Marie Gluesenkamp Perez are crowing.

All of this dissension is reflected onto Joe Kent, who doesn’t deserve it. At least one articulate Kent supporter at the meeting disagreed with the majority vote, realizing how unfair it would be to deny recognition to someone who just a few years before had been recognized as a Republican when she ran for Camas City Council. When I had a chance to speak, I recalled hearing from Lewallen how active she had been in the Federalist Society, meeting extensively with a hero of both hers and mine – Antonin Scalia.

Some poorly informed PCOs believe such a move to deny Lewallen recognition will keep Lewallen off the ballot, which is of course absurd. If she so chooses, she has the freedom – yes, the freedom – to file for election as a Republican. She does not need the benefits of recognition very much, such as her literature in the Fair Booth and Republican HQ, and access to our mailing lists. She can duplicate those functions herself.

As a party, we Republicans believe in personal freedom and civic freedom. Yet some who voted in the majority to turn their backs on Lewallen adopted a totalitarian approach. Hero patriot Joe Kent does not deserve to be represented in that manner.

Ann Donnelly 
Vancouver

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: Neighbors for a Better Crossing urges Oregon Legislators to demand full audit of IBR project, echoing Washington’s HB 2669
  Gary Clark of Neighbors for a Better Crossing urges Oregon lawmakers to pursue an audit of the Interstate Bridge Replacement project similar to Washington’s HB 2669 proposal.
• 
  Opinion: Climate Commitment Act – Washington’s hidden carbon tax hits hard
  Opinion, columns, Washington state, Climate Commitment Act, CCA Washington, Washington carbon tax debate, Washington gas prices, Nancy Churchill, Dangerous Rhetoric, Washington climate policy, Washington fuel costs, Travis Couture, Washington Department of Ecology, Washington Department of Commerce, Washington carbon credit auctions, Washington cap and trade program, Washington environmental policy
• 
  Letter: The Missing Skamania Report – The prosecuting attorney is still sitting on it
  Rob Anderson questions why an investigative report into potential County Charter and OPMA violations has not received an outside review after being declined by multiple offices.
• 
  Opinion: Washington’s charter schools deliver – if the state lets them
  Vicki Murray argues that Washington’s charter schools are posting stronger academic results than comparable peers while facing funding inequities that are shrinking the sector.
• 
  Letter: IBR’s money pit
  Bob Ortblad argues the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program is withholding a higher cost estimate while moving forward with limited funding and an unclear construction timeline.