Vancouver resident Debra Kalz seeks answers for the councilors’ decision
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
While we were metaphorically sleeping, the Vancouver City Council decided to do away with being able to address the council as a whole in Citizen Comments on any subject and relegate them to a public form once a month.
I’ve tried to get an answer as to what and why this has taken place. This is the City’s response:
Thank you for reaching out to the City Council regarding your concerns.
Public testimony regarding items on the Council’s agenda is televised on CVTV cable channel 23/323 and live-streamed on http://www.cvtv.org. The City Council decided to provide an additional opportunity for the public to speak with them about any topic of interest, not just those topics on the formal agenda, by adding a monthly community forum following the conclusion of our last regular meeting of the month.
The Council discussed this opportunity and our desire not to televise it at our June 17, 2024, meeting. We have heard from constituents who are not comfortable talking to the Council on camera, and we wanted to make sure all people felt comfortable in these opportunities. We similarly do not televise our quarterly Council Community Forums. You can hear the Council’s discussion on this issue by visiting the June 17 update under City Manager Communications on CVTV.org: https://www.cvtv.org/vid_link/36543?startStreamAt=0&stopStreamAt=5426. The discussion occurs at about 1 hour and 17 minutes.
While we do not televise the monthly community forum opportunities, members of the public who wish to testify remotely are able to do so by registering by 12 p.m. on the day of the Council meeting. The testimony that is provided during the community forum is also audio recorded and can be provided upon request for anyone who wishes to hear that recording. And as with all City programs and services, Vancouver is willing to make reasonable accommodations for qualified individuals with disabilities.
Thank you again for your interest in Vancouver City Council meetings and sharing your concerns with us. The City Council members are blind copied on this response for their awareness.
This public forum is not televised.
Here’s the link to the decision of the City Council: https://www.cvtv.org/vid_link/36543?startStreamAt=0&stopStreamAt=5426
It is of my opinion that this makes access to our government very limited and prohibits citizen’s who are unable to attend.
Debra Kalz
Vancouver
Also read:
- Opinion: Transit agencies need accountability not increased state subsidy
Charles Prestrud argues that Washington transit agencies face rising costs and declining ridership due to governance structures that lack public accountability. - Letter: ‘For years, American foreign policy too often felt like a blank check’
Vancouver resident Peter Bracchi argues that the 2025 National Security Strategy marks a long-overdue shift toward clearer priorities, shared responsibility, and interest-based American leadership. - POLL: Are you better off than you were a year ago?
This week’s poll asks readers to reflect on their personal financial situation and whether they feel better off than they were a year ago as economic conditions continue to shift. - Opinion: Does tailgating cause speeding?
Target Zero Manager Doug Dahl examines whether tailgating contributes to speeding and explains why following too closely increases crash risk with little benefit. - Opinion: ‘The Democrats’ part of the bargain’
Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance reflects on a New Year’s Eve encounter and a Bill Maher commentary to assess what he sees as cultural and political changes from the past year.
wpDiscuz
