Bob Ortblad believes an immersed tunnel alternative will be safer, have environmental benefits, be faster to build, be more earthquake resilient, and save billions of dollars
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
The Interstate Bridge Replacement Program (IBR) plans to solicit design-build bids for a bridge and approaches. The Federal Highway Administration, the U.S. Coast Guard, and the Joint Oregon-Washington Legislative Oversight Committee should require the IBR to also solicit design-build bids for an immersed tunnel. An immersed tunnel alternative will be safer, have environmental benefits, be faster to build, be more earthquake resilient, and save billions of dollars.
In July 2021, the IBR fraudulently disqualified an immersed tunnel with an error-filled “Tunnel Concept Assessment” report. One year later, in June 2022, the U.S. Coast Guard informed the IBR that the vertical navigation clearance must be 178 feet, and a tunnel or lift bridge must be evaluated. The IBR is ignoring the Coast Guard’s tunnel directive and continues to cite its fraudulent tunnel evaluation.
The IBR, Vancouver, and Portland should study Antwerp’s immersed tunnels. Twice, Antwerp rejected a bridge and selected an immersed tunnel. Vancouver, B.C., has also rejected a bridge design and is now building an eight-lane immersed tunnel under the Fraser River.
On a recent vacation to Belgium, I drove through Antwerp’s Kennedy Tunnel, a six-lane immersed tunnel. It was opened in 1969 and has 160,000 vehicles crossing a day. In 1963, an invitation to tender was issued for the construction of a bridge or a tunnel; technical experts decided in favor of a tunnel.
In 2009, the citizens of Antwerp approved a referendum, the first in the city’s history, that rejected a massive bridge design in favor of an immersed tunnel. Antwerp’s Scheldt Tunnel is currently under construction, and four of its eight segments have been placed. It will have six lanes with eight immersed segments, totaling 4,200 feet, which is 50% longer than the 2,700 feet needed for an I-5 Columbia River immersed tunnel. This tunnel is being built for $670 million, a fraction of IBR’s $3 billion for bridge and approaches.
The IBR’s massive bridge design has a long list of problems that can be avoided with an immersed tunnel.
- Too low for the U.S. Coast Guard 116’, required 178’
- Dangerously steep 3%, north-facing, elevated S-curve
- Rebuilt antiquated cloverleafs
- Steep 7% curved off ramp to SR-14
- A dozen 50-foot-wide bridge piers that alter river currents and harbor predatory fish
- 160 costly 10-foot diameter drilled shafts into an unpredictable river bottom
- 20 acres of massive, elevated bridge approaches that will devastate Fort Vancouver, downtown, and Hayden Island
- Icy elevated bridge approaches
- Elevated bridge approaches with earthquake risk.
- Noise and toxic pollution from approaches and the bridge
- Crosswinds on a high bridge
- Dangerous in river construction
- Unnecessary demolition of current bridges
- Demolition of the six-story Hurley Building
- Demolition of 43 homes
- Demolition of 35 businesses
- Half-mile-long spiral bike ramp
- 90-foot-high transit station
- 6 acres of Vancouver for parking for 1,270 vehicles
Bob Ortblad MSCE, MBA
Seattle
Also read:
- Rep. John Ley’s new bill calls for an independent audit of Interstate 5 Bridge Replacement Project
Rep. John Ley introduced legislation requiring an independent audit of the Interstate 5 Bridge Replacement Project to review costs, management, and oversight. - Opinion: IBR’s evasive, misleading and dishonest excuses for higher cost
Joe Cortright argues the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program has withheld detailed cost estimates while offering contradictory explanations for rising costs tied to the I-5 Bridge project. - Rep. David Stuebe sponsors bill to strengthen enforcement of auto insurance laws and protect Washington drivers
Rep. David Stuebe has introduced HB 2308, a bill aimed at strengthening enforcement of Washington’s auto insurance laws and increasing accountability for repeat uninsured drivers. - Letter: Interstate Bridge Replacement’s Park & Ride insanity
Bob Ortblad criticizes the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s proposed Park & Ride garages, arguing the costs are excessive and unlikely to receive federal funding. - Letter: Interstate Bridge Replacement $13.6 billion estimate is too low!
Bob Ortblad argues the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $13.6 billion cost estimate understates the true expense, citing comparable projects, construction challenges, and engineering assumptions.
wpDiscuz
