Bob Ortblad warns of what will happen if the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program team’s plan to politically pressure the Coast Guard to accept its Locally Preferred Alternative
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
Washington and Oregon are risking $2.5 billion of federal grants to replace the Columbia River I-5 Bridge. The U.S.Coast Guard has suggested the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program (IBR) consider a tunnel as an alternative to an impractical tall bridge (178-foot clearance).
The USCG must see that the IBR’s “Tunnel Concept Assessment” is incorrect and misleading. The IBR is ignoring the USCG‘s 178-foot clearance requirement and has pressed municipalities and agencies to approve its “Locally Approved Alternative” (LPA) a too low bridge (116-foot clearance).
If the IBR‘s plan to politically pressure the USCG to accept its LPA fails, federal funds will go to better projects.
The Washington-Oregon Legislative Committee should support the USCG’s tunnel evaluation recommendation and hire a consultant, independent of the IBR, to do an honest evaluation of an I-5 immersed tunnel.
Bob Ortblad, MSCE, MBA
Seattle
Also read:
- POLL: Should C-TRAN taxpayers be protected from paying additional costs tied to extending light rail to Library Square?
C-TRAN’s board asked IBR to extend light rail to Library Square but voted down taxpayer cost protections. - Letter: When the city of Vancouver’s own photos prove the problem
Over 5,000 Vancouver police photos obtained via FOIA show repeated cleanup notices and the same conditions returning. - Opinion: What would it take for elected officials to believe high earners are leaving Washington?
Capital gains tax collections fell more than 50% in 2024 despite a 25% stock market gain that year. - Opinion: IBR creates 50,000 road refugees
Lars Larson argues IBR’s tolling plan would push 50,000 daily commuters off I-5 onto I-205. - Opinion: It’s time to save taxpayers from Sound Transit’s strategic misrepresentation
Sound Transit’s ST3 rail program faces a $35 billion shortfall, and Southwest Washington taxpayers could bear new costs.
wpDiscuz
