Federal Highway Administration is funding a dangerous bridge

Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com

The Federal Aviation Administration’s certification of Boeing’s 737 MAX resulted in two plane crashes and 346 deaths. The FAA issued a $2.5 billion face-saving fine.

In a grim coincidence, the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program (IBR) is asking for $2.5 billion in federal grants to build a dangerous bridge. During the 100-life of its bridge, there will be thousands of crashes and an untold number of injuries and deaths. A 737 software flaw was hidden in a million lines of code. 

The IBR’s I-5 Bridge design flaws are obvious to anyone who has driven across the I-205 Bridge, just upstream. Its grade, curve, rain, wind, and ice make it a perilous crossing. The I-205 Bridge is ranked by Go Save Labs as the nation’s eighth most dangerous accident hotspot. The IBR I-5 Bridge design will be almost twice as steep (4%), have the same weather, antiquated cloverleafs, limited sight distance, a 7% off-ramp to SR-14, and I-205-style curve. Bridge crashes will be frequent and over time injuries and deaths will equal a plane crash.

The Federal Highway Administration recently awarded the IBR its first federal grant, $1 million to do a redundant study on liquefaction during an earthquake. Ten years ago the Columbia River Crossing spent $12 million on a dozen geotechnical consultants and $31 million on WSDOT management and geotechnical studies. Continued funding of the IBR by the FWHA should stop until the IBR has a safe design.

The IBR continues to ignore a safer and less costly immersed tunnel alternative.

Bob Ortblad MSCE, MBA
Seattle

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: WA Cares investment meeting talks money, mentions renewed website
  The state’s long-term care fund, WA Cares, has already spent a significant amount of money and offers limited benefits to workers, highlighting concerns about its effectiveness and potential drawbacks. Elizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center provides some of the meeting’s highlights.
• 
  Opinion: Let’s eliminate light rail and tolling from the I-5 Bridge replacement at the same time
  Editor Ken Vance shares changes to elements of the proposed project that he believes many Southwest Washington residents would support.
• 
  Opinion: State salary report shows running a school district is often the best job in town
  Liv Finne of the Washington Policy Center believes that it’s important for the public to be informed about how much school leaders are paid and how effective the system is at educating children. Washington State Fiscal Information
• 
  Letter: ‘The process for restoring an effective representative form of government is now about the healthy functioning of citizens’ minds on important matters’
  Matt Garland states that Congresswoman Marie Gluesenkamp Perez is misusing federal funds by using taxpayer dollars to pay for her campaign mailers and that her town halls are really not public outreach town halls.
• 
  Should Washington workers fired for refusing to receive a COVID-19 vaccine be rehired by the state?
  Should Washington workers fired for refusing to receive a COVID-19 vaccine be rehired by the state?