
According to DSHS, its ‘restoration services’ involve a combination of medical care and classes about legal proceedings
Last week, a group of 22 county prosecutors from around Washington filed a lawsuit against the Inslee Administration’s state Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) over the agency’s decision to stop treating mentally-ill criminal defendants who’ve had their charges dropped because they’re not well enough to understand what’s going on in court.
According to DSHS, its “restoration services” involve a combination of medical care and classes about legal proceedings. If the state fails to provide that treatment, or if it fails to restore a criminal defendant to competency, then prosecutors can dismiss the charges against the defendant and try to get that person treatment through the civil side of the judicial system. The dismissal of charges makes the person a “civil conversion patient.”
Currently, incompetent criminal defendants in Washington wait about seven months before getting treatment at one of the state’s mental hospitals. State law and federal court orders call for a maximum wait time of seven days.
DSHS plans to release approximately 200 civil conversion patients statewide — and at least 45 in King County alone — by September 7, with little formal notice given to local authorities. One King County attorney referred to DSHS’s plan as a “fire sale release.” The earliest the counties’ lawsuit will go before a judge is September 8. The day after the fire sale.
In their lawsuit, the counties argue denying mental-health care to people whose charges have been dropped does several bad things:
- it violates state law on restoration of competence for criminal defendants (RCW 10.77.088);
- it places an untenable strain on county resources; and
- it puts public safety at risk.
The counties’ press release announcing the lawsuit went on to state:
“DSHS claims that its refusal to follow state law with conversion patients is the fault of the federal court. However, there is nothing in the court’s orders that interferes with DSHS’s obligation or ability to provide…restorative services.”
Having reviewed the counties’ lawsuit, WSRP Chairman Jim Walsh issued the following statement in response: “Another week, another lawsuit over the failures of the Inslee Administration. Right now, it’s 22 counties versus Inslee’s bureaucrats at DSHS.
“When charges are dropped against a criminal defendant who’s been found by the courts to be mentally incompetent — and the state won’t give that person mental-health care at a psychiatric facility like Western State Hospital — Inslee’s bureaucrats just send the person back to the streets.
“This latest lawsuit is separate from the older and higher-profile Trueblood v. DSHS case. But the two lawsuits are connected. A few months ago, the federal judge hearing the Trueblood case found the Inslee Administration and DSHS in contempt and ordered them to pay more than $100 million in fines for failing to provide timely psychiatric services to mentally-ill people forced to wait in jail. Now, the Inslee Administration is blaming that $100 million fine for its ongoing failures. Specifically, one of its spokespeople has said, in response to questions about the more-recent lawsuit from the counties: the ‘federal court has substantially impaired our ability to treat and care for [civil conversion] patients such as these.’ This finger-pointing is disappointing—but familiar. With the current governor, his failures are always someone else’s fault.
“And the story gets worse. In a January 2023 letter, the Washington Superior Court Judges’ Association (SCJA) informed DSHS that its failure to deliver care to civil conversion patients ‘may worsen Washington state’s public safety crisis’ and ‘contributes substantially to a scenario in which individuals requiring clinical treatment are released with no accountability for criminal, often violent, behavior.’ DSHS has ignored that warning.
“The people of Washington have suffered the Inslee Administration’s bureaucratic failures for too long. We’re living with the consequences—rampant drug abuse, inhumane treatment of mentally-ill people and violent crime rising in our neighborhoods. People who are too mentally ill to stand trial for their criminal actions shouldn’t be turned out into the streets. They should be in Western State Hospital.
“The Trueblood case and the more recent lawsuit from the 22 county prosecutors are the first steps in a reckoning. We need better state laws and public policy. We need a change in Olympia and better results out of D.C. We need a return to common sense in our beautiful state.”
The counties whose prosecutors have joined the recent lawsuit include: Asotin, Clallam, Cowlitz, Douglas, Grant, Grays Harbor, Island, Jefferson, King, Kitsap, Klickitat, Lewis, Lincoln, Pacific, Pierce, Skagit, Skamania, Snohomish, Spokane, Thurston, Whatcom, and Yakima Counties.
Also read:
- Opinion: Interstate Bridge replacement – the forever projectJoe Cortright argues the Interstate Bridge Replacement Project could bring tolling and traffic disruptions on I-5 through the mid-2040s.
- 2026 Columbia River spring Chinook seasons announcedWashington and Oregon fishery managers approved 2026 Columbia River spring Chinook seasons, with a forecast of 147,300 upriver fish and specific fishing windows from March through early May.
- Opinion: Make your voice heard about the majority party’s state income tax proposalRep. John Ley outlines his opposition to Senate Bill 6346 and urges residents to participate in the February 24 public hearing before the House Finance Committee.
- A late starter in her sports, Clark College athlete is excelling in basketball and track and fieldClark College’s Emily Peabody, a late starter in basketball and track, now leads the NWAC in scoring and is a conference champion sprinter.
- Letter: County Council resolution ‘strong on rhetoric, weak on results’Peter Bracchi calls on the Clark County Council to withdraw its ICE-related resolution and replace it with a measurable public-safety plan.
- Trump vows new tariffs, criticizes Supreme Court justices after rulingPresident Donald Trump said he will pursue new tariffs under different authorities after the Supreme Court ruled he exceeded his power under IEEPA.
- Opinion: A loss at the Supreme CourtLars Larson reacts to a Supreme Court decision limiting President Trump’s tariff authority and outlines his view of its economic impact.







