
On Thursday, WSDOT maintenance crews and Clark County Public Utilities will replace the existing power pole and anchor along SR 500, in Vancouver
CLARK – Travelers who use State Route 500 in Clark County, should plan for delays.
On Thursday, Aug. 7, the Washington State Department of Transportation maintenance crews and Clark County Public Utilities will replace the existing power pole and anchor along SR 500, in Vancouver.
Over time, power poles can wear out due to weather, age, and damage. Replacing power poles can help prevent outages, keep travelers safe and ensures electricity flows smoothly for everyone.
What to expect
From 9 p.m., Thursday, Aug. 7 to 5 a.m., Friday, Aug. 8:
- The right lane along northbound SR 500 at the Northeast 117th Avenue/Northeast Fourth Plain Boulevard interchange (milepost 6.02) will close overnight.
Travelers are reminded to slow down, stay focused and follow directional signs through the work zone.
Know before you go
Get real-time travel information via the WSDOT mobile app, the real-time travel map, or by signing up for email updates and alerts.
Also read:
- Opinion: IBR’s systematic disinformation campaign, its demiseNeighbors for a Better Crossing challenges IBR’s seismic claims and promotes a reuse-and-tunnel alternative they say would save billions at the I-5 crossing.
- Opinion: Is a state income tax coming, and the latest on the I-5 Bridge projectRep. John Ley shares a legislative update on a proposed state income tax, the I-5 Bridge project, the Brockmann Campus and House Bill 2605.
- Board authorizes C-TRAN to sign off on Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s SEISThe C-TRAN Board approved the Final SEIS for the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program, with Camas and Washougal opposing the vote over light rail cost concerns.
- C-TRAN ridership grows for fourth consecutive yearC-TRAN ridership topped 5 million trips in 2025, marking the fourth straight year of growth.
- Opinion: ‘If they want light rail, they should be the ones who pay for it’Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance argues that supporters of light rail tied to the I-5 Bridge replacement should bear the local cost of operating and maintaining the system through a narrowly drawn sub-district.






