The court plans to conduct a ‘trial on paper’ to determine whether or not the fines imposed on him were too excessive under state law
TJ Martinell
The Center Square Washington
More than three years ago, tax protester and initiative sponsor Tim Eyman was fined millions of dollars stemming from Public Disclosure Commission campaign finance violations in 2012.
Now, a court plans to conduct a “trial on paper” to determine whether or not the fines imposed on him were too excessive under state law.
The Washington State Constitution’s Article 1, Section 14 contains a provision that protects individuals from receiving fines considered excessive for several reasons, including too “severe” for the offense committed or regarded as so burdensome it denies them the ability to obtain basic needs. Additionally, the fines must take into account the individual’s ability to pay it.
In his request for remand, Eyman’s legal counsel Richard Saunders, a former State Supreme Court justice, argued that it even if no interest was accrued on the $8 million he owes in fines and attorneys fees, it would take him 67 years to pay it off if he made $10,000 monthly contributions.
“If that does not demonstrate Mr. Eyman’s lack of ability to pay, your undersigned cannot imagine what would,” the court document states.
The request for remand instead proposes that the court “set the penalty at an amount commensurate with Mr. Eyman’s current financial circumstances.” Eyman, who declared bankruptcy in 2018, produced tax and financial documents demonstrating that he has been “left impoverished and almost destitute.”
The Court of Appeals handed the case to Thurston County Superior Court. At Friday’s hearing, Judge Chris Lanese noted that he would only be looking at the issue of whether or not Eyman was capable of paying the fines based on his financial circumstances at the time they were imposed, rather than his current financial situation. As part of the “trial on paper,” Lanese will examine affidavits and other exhibits submitted by both parties.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Update: Belkot’s legal team submits sheriff’s report to its case against Clark County Council
Michelle Belkot’s legal challenge against the Clark County Council advanced after a sheriff’s report alleging rule violations was accepted into evidence. - Opinion: ‘If you tolerate lies and dishonesty from the government, you’re guaranteed more’
Lars Larson criticizes state officials for refusing to disclose updated cost estimates for the Interstate Bridge Replacement project, arguing that a lack of transparency guarantees further government dishonesty. - Maneuver to shore up WA’s transportation budget could be reversed
Washington lawmakers are weighing whether to reverse a planned sales tax transfer to transportation as they confront a looming operating budget shortfall. - County regional parks annual parking passes now available for purchase
Clark County has begun selling 2026 annual parking passes for its regional parks ahead of a $5 daily parking fee that takes effect Jan. 1. - Opinion: Tax slave to Washington state?
Nancy Churchill argues that Washington lawmakers increasingly treat taxation as entitlement rather than necessity, shifting the balance of power away from citizens and toward government. - Clark County Law Library increases hours of operation in January 2026
The Clark County Law Library will extend its weekday hours beginning Jan. 2, 2026, providing additional access to legal resources and librarian assistance. - Rep. John Ley issues statement after I-5 Bridge replacement meeting yields few answers
Rep. John Ley criticized the IBR Program for failing to provide updated cost estimates or key design decisions following a recent legislative oversight committee meeting.
