
If certified, the initiative would get sent to the Legislature at the next regular session
Carleen Johnson
The Center Square Washington
Backers of an initiative to the Legislature requiring proof of citizenship to vote in Washington state say opponents are trying to confuse the public and spread misinformation about the measure.
Initiative Measure No. IL26-126 is sponsored by Rep. Jim Walsh, R-Aberdeen, the Chair of the Washington State Republican Party.
“IL26-126 does one thing: It requires proof of identity when people register to vote in Washington,” Walsh told The Center Square. “Just like when you get on an airplane. That’s it.”
Walsh was critical of a new numbering system for initiatives to the Legislature, which took effect on March 9, 2024.
According to the Washington Secretary of State’s Office, the new system works like this:
When a sponsor submits the final text of a proposed Initiative to the Legislature, it receives a random three-digit number.
This number is determined by rolling three 10-sided dice.
The full identification number is eight characters long, starting with “IL,” followed by the last two digits of the year the Legislature will review the initiative, a hyphen, and the random three-digit number.
If a number has been used before, the dice are rolled again until a unique number is generated.”
“I think that the secretary of state has rejiggered its numbering standards to make initiatives harder to publicize and promote,” Walsh speculated.
The Center Square emailed the SoS to inquire about the new numbering system, but did not receive a response.
The initiative seeks to require residents to establish their status as U.S. citizens with documentation, like a passport or birth certificate. County election officials would confer with the Department of Licensing to ensure that everyone on the voter rolls was actually a citizen.
Voters who had not produced proof would be notified and given notice to provide needed documents or be taken off the list of eligible voters before the 2027 general election.
According to the SoS, to vote in Washington, people must prove they are at least 18 years old, live in the state, and be a U.S. citizen.
“Bob Ferguson and other sanctuary state supporters are lying and spreading misinformation about what IL26-126 does,” Walsh continued. “Lawlessness breeds lawlessness. We’ve had too much of that. Let’s get back to enforcing the law. IL26-126 helps with that healing.”
Walsh said IL26-126 seeks to require proof of citizenship and nothing more.
“The initiative doesn’t end vote-by-mail,” he said. “It doesn’t touch ballot processing. Just voter identification.”
While several states are considering measures to restrict or eliminate certain aspects of vote-by-mail, Walsh claims that is not his motivation for this initiative.
However, the Washington State Republican Party recently joined the regional movement to end vote-by-mail, complicating matters.
Washington Attorney General Nick Brown has stated that Washington has a secure and fair election system.
The conservative Heritage Foundation recently released its latest “Election Integrity Scorecard,” which examines factors such as voter identification implementation, voter list accuracy, absentee ballot management, citizenship verification and other relevant attributes.
Washington ranked 46th out of 50 states and Washington, D.C. Only Nevada, Oregon, Vermont, California and Hawaii ranked worse.
Walsh said supporters expect to start gathering signatures for the initiative in about 10 days.
To get IL26-126 on the ballot, signatures of at least 308,911 registered voters must be collected and submitted by 5 p.m. on Jan. 2, 2026.
If certified, the initiative would get sent to the Legislature at the next regular session.
Lawmakers would then have to decide between three options: adopting the initiative as proposed; rejecting or taking no action, in which case the initiative is placed on the ballot for voters to decide at the next general election; approving an alternative to the proposed initiative so that both are placed on the ballot for voters to consider at the next general election.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- C-TRAN board member regrets vote that could leave Clark County taxpayers on the hook for light railC-TRAN board member Tim Hein says he regrets a 2023 vote that could commit Clark County to funding light rail O&M. He’s now urging the board to reverse course and protect taxpayers.
- Social media activity of Clark County public defender questionedPublic Defender Renee Alsept’s anti-Trump social media posts have sparked concern from citizens and former officials, but Clark County says personal accounts aren’t covered by policy.
- Opinion: ‘Vilifying broad swaths of Americans’Editor Ken Vance reflects on troubling posts by public defender Renee Alsept and shares a thoughtful perspective from longtime attorney Brad Andersen on ethics, discourse, and professionalism.
- POLL: Should the county update its Human Resources policy to include personal social media accounts of employees in sensitive roles?This week’s Clark County Today poll asks whether the county should update its Human Resources policy to include personal social media accounts of employees in sensitive roles, following concerns over online conduct.
- Project 42 launches its third county project in Clark County with Leslie Lewallen as directorProject 42 has launched its Clark County initiative with Camas Council member Leslie Lewallen as director, aiming to boost civic engagement and local government accountability.
- Paddle Safe Week begins July 22, teaches importance of water safetyPaddle Safe Week runs July 22–28 and highlights water safety practices for paddlers across Washington, including life jacket use and cold water shock prevention.
- Council for the Homeless releases 2025 Point-in-Time Count for Clark CountyThe 2025 Point-in-Time Count found increases in sheltered seniors and unsheltered individuals across Clark County, with CFTH emphasizing the need for long-term housing solutions.